arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language · · 3 min read

Chunking Methods on Retrieval-Augmented Generation - Effectiveness Evaluation Against Computational Cost and Limitations

Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Computation and Language

arXiv:2606.00881 (cs)
[Submitted on 30 May 2026]

Title:Chunking Methods on Retrieval-Augmented Generation - Effectiveness Evaluation Against Computational Cost and Limitations

Authors:Mateusz Śmigielski (1), Michał Rajkowski (1), Mateusz Zbrocki (1), Michał Bernacki-Janson (1), Karol Kunicki (1), Julianna Godziszewska (1), Maciej Piasecki (1), Konrad Wojtasik (1) ((1) Department of Artificial Intelligence, Faculty of Information and Communication Technology, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Wrocław 50-370, Poland)
View a PDF of the paper titled Chunking Methods on Retrieval-Augmented Generation - Effectiveness Evaluation Against Computational Cost and Limitations, by Mateusz \'Smigielski (1) and 11 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has demonstrated significant capabilities in enhancing the performance of Large Language Models (LLMs). One of the key tasks in RAG systems is the chunking process. Traditionally, fixed-size chunking and semantic chunking have been the standard approaches. However, interest in chunking strategies has been increasing, leading to a growing number of proposed methods that often claim improved performance over these conventional techniques. Many of these approaches are tailored to specific use cases and data types, with limited evidence of their effectiveness across diverse scenarios. As a result, it remains challenging to directly compare different techniques and assess their relative strengths. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to systematically evaluate the effectiveness of a wide range of chunking methods and emphasize the underlying challenges of chunking strategies in RAG systems. While chunking is commonly treated as a simple preprocessing step, we show that it introduces a range of impactful and often overlooked issues.
Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL)
Cite as: arXiv:2606.00881 [cs.CL]
  (or arXiv:2606.00881v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.00881
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Mateusz Smigielski [view email]
[v1] Sat, 30 May 2026 20:32:08 UTC (4,215 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Chunking Methods on Retrieval-Augmented Generation - Effectiveness Evaluation Against Computational Cost and Limitations, by Mateusz \'Smigielski (1) and 11 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source

Current browse context:

cs.CL
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language