arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language · · 3 min read

When Is 0.1% Enough? Analyzing the Combined Effects of Dimensionality Reduction and Quantization on Text Embedding Compression

Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Computation and Language

arXiv:2606.01074 (cs)
[Submitted on 31 May 2026]

Title:When Is 0.1% Enough? Analyzing the Combined Effects of Dimensionality Reduction and Quantization on Text Embedding Compression

View a PDF of the paper titled When Is 0.1% Enough? Analyzing the Combined Effects of Dimensionality Reduction and Quantization on Text Embedding Compression, by Riku Kisako and 2 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Recent high-performing text embedding models often output high-dimensional real-valued vectors, resulting in substantial storage and computational costs. To address this issue, compression methods based on dimensionality reduction or quantization have been proposed; however, the effects of combining dimensionality reduction and quantization have not been sufficiently investigated. In this paper, we systematically examine the effectiveness of compressing text embeddings by combining dimensionality reduction and quantization, using four MTEB task families and four pretrained embedding models. The experimental results demonstrate that combining dimensionality reduction and quantization enables substantially stronger compression than using either method alone, that in some settings embeddings can be reduced to as little as 0.1% of their original size with almost no performance degradation, and that the optimal compression strategy depends on the task.
Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL)
Cite as: arXiv:2606.01074 [cs.CL]
  (or arXiv:2606.01074v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.01074
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Riku Kisako [view email]
[v1] Sun, 31 May 2026 07:37:34 UTC (431 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled When Is 0.1% Enough? Analyzing the Combined Effects of Dimensionality Reduction and Quantization on Text Embedding Compression, by Riku Kisako and 2 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source

Current browse context:

cs.CL
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language