How Reliable Are Multimodal Signals of Conversational State? Evidence from Remote Dyadic Collaborative Tasks
Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Computation and Language
arXiv:2607.17452 (cs)
[Submitted on 20 Jul 2026]
Title:How Reliable Are Multimodal Signals of Conversational State? Evidence from Remote Dyadic Collaborative Tasks
Authors:Tahiya Chowdhury
View a PDF of the paper titled How Reliable Are Multimodal Signals of Conversational State? Evidence from Remote Dyadic Collaborative Tasks, by Tahiya Chowdhury
View PDF
HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Measuring conversational states such as cognitive load and conversational power from multimodal behavior requires characteristic features that are not only predictive but also reliable across task contexts. We present a three-dimensional evaluation framework assessing predictive accuracy, cross-task generalizability, and test-retest reliability, applied to interactional, acoustic, and linguistic features extracted from dyadic conversations during collaborative tasks performed over a video-conferencing platform (AVCAffe dataset; 53 dyads, 9 tasks). Our results show that no single feature family dominates all three dimensions. Linguistic features show the highest predictive accuracy for cognitive load but collapse under cross-task evaluation, revealing sensitivity to task-specific vocabulary. Additionally, acoustic reliability, often reported as evidence of feature stability, degrades once speaker identity is controlled, confirming that standard prosodic features measure vocal characteristics rather than conversational state. Interaction features provide the only genuinely reliable signal, unchanged after speaker normalization. Interestingly, classifying power role remained near chance baseline across all conditions, indicating limitations of task-level aggregated behavior for predicting power role in conversation. Our findings reveal three insights: (1) linguistic features predict best but generalize poorly across task contexts; (2) acoustic reliability collapses to near-zero once speaker identity is controlled, challenging standard evaluation practice; and (3) interaction features provide the only genuinely reliable signal, with floor dominance predicting within-dyad cognitive load asymmetry. These results argue for speaker normalization and multi-dimensional evaluation as prerequisites for context-aware, robust multimodal feature selection in conversational systems.
| Comments: | Accepted, to appear in Proceedings of ACM International Conference on Multimodal Interaction 2026, 13 pages, 6 figures, 4 tables |
| Subjects: | Computation and Language (cs.CL) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2607.17452 [cs.CL] |
| (or arXiv:2607.17452v1 [cs.CL] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.17452
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
|
|
| Related DOI: | https://doi.org/10.1145/3776574.3831235
DOI(s) linking to related resources
|
Full-text links:
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
View a PDF of the paper titled How Reliable Are Multimodal Signals of Conversational State? Evidence from Remote Dyadic Collaborative Tasks, by Tahiya Chowdhury
References & Citations
Loading...
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Recommenders and Search Tools
Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language
-
Geometric and Behavioral Stratification in Transformer Residual Streams
Aug 14
-
Perturbation-based Regional Interpretability through Subtraction Mapping (PRISM): naming-error dissociations in language models and post-stroke aphasia
Aug 14
-
I-SDPO: Instance-Level Adaptive Self-Distillation Policy Optimization
Aug 14
-
Comment on "Modeling rapid language learning by distilling Bayesian priors into artificial neural networks"
Aug 14
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.