arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language · · 4 min read

Cardiologent: Multi-Agent Clinical Decision Support for Patient-Level Arrhythmia Assessment, Urgency, and Management

Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence

arXiv:2607.25340 (cs)
[Submitted on 28 Jul 2026]

Title:Cardiologent: Multi-Agent Clinical Decision Support for Patient-Level Arrhythmia Assessment, Urgency, and Management

View a PDF of the paper titled Cardiologent: Multi-Agent Clinical Decision Support for Patient-Level Arrhythmia Assessment, Urgency, and Management, by Sukju Oh and 3 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:The same episode of atrial fibrillation is a minor finding in a healthy adult and grounds for anticoagulation in an elderly patient with hypertension: identical signal, opposite decision. Naming the rhythm is only the start; what determines a patient's outcome is the judgement that follows -- what the arrhythmia is across the whole record, what it means for this patient, and what should be done about it. Recent work pairing large language models with the ECG stops short of this, reading one recording without assembling a patient-level finding; and agentic systems built around it either receive the arrhythmia a device has already detected or target a different diagnostic task, stopping before the decision this task requires. We formulate patient-level arrhythmia decision support as a task and present Cardiologent, a multi-agent system that spans it from detection to decision. An agent for each signal -- a single ECG lead and the photoplethysmogram a wearable acquires -- grounds its window reading in measured features rather than a bare label; the readings are assembled into the patient's rhythm profile and, with the patient's own data, reasoned against clinical guidelines retrieved for the case, with a critic checking each conclusion against the guideline it cites. We evaluate the clinical decision rather than the report, across integrated diagnosis, clinical significance, and urgency and management. Cardiologent scores highest on every axis, first on every patient-level task under both cardiologists and an at-scale LLM judge -- whose agreement with the cardiologists (ICC 0.74, 0.66) matches theirs with each other (0.67). Because each conclusion traces to a cited guideline and is validated against expert cardiologists, it yields decisions a clinician can audit rather than act on blindly -- a step toward use in continuous monitoring.
Comments: 21 pages, 8 figures
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL)
Cite as: arXiv:2607.25340 [cs.AI]
  (or arXiv:2607.25340v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.25340
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Sukju Oh [view email]
[v1] Tue, 28 Jul 2026 06:43:39 UTC (6,478 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Cardiologent: Multi-Agent Clinical Decision Support for Patient-Level Arrhythmia Assessment, Urgency, and Management, by Sukju Oh and 3 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source

Current browse context:

cs.AI
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language