arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language · · 3 min read

Do Speech Emphasis Models Generalize across Languages and Emotions?

Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Computation and Language

arXiv:2606.27717 (cs)
[Submitted on 26 Jun 2026]

Title:Do Speech Emphasis Models Generalize across Languages and Emotions?

View a PDF of the paper titled Do Speech Emphasis Models Generalize across Languages and Emotions?, by Megan Wei and 5 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Prosodic emphasis varies across languages, emotions, and speaking styles, yet existing emphasis detection models are largely trained and evaluated on monolingual neutral read speech. We introduce MMEE (Multilingual Multi-Emotion Emphasis), a corpus of 10,000 professionally recorded expressive utterances (14.13 hours) across 7 languages and 34 emotion/style categories, with three-level perceptual labels (10 annotations per sample). We benchmark two state-of-the-art architectures under monolingual, cross-lingual, multilingual, cross-emotion, cross-dataset, and data-scale settings. Monolingual models show limited zero-shot transfer, degrading across typologically distant languages, while multilingual training substantially improves robustness. Models transfer robustly between high- and low-arousal emotions; bidirectional transfer between synthetic and perceptual benchmarks suggests shared prosodic structure; and performance stays robust even at smaller training scales.
Comments: Interspeech 2026
Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Sound (cs.SD); Audio and Speech Processing (eess.AS)
Cite as: arXiv:2606.27717 [cs.CL]
  (or arXiv:2606.27717v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.27717
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Megan Wei [view email]
[v1] Fri, 26 Jun 2026 04:54:43 UTC (447 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

Current browse context:

cs.CL
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language