Relation Geometry in Semantic Space of Language Models
Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Computation and Language
Title:Relation Geometry in Semantic Space of Language Models
Abstract:When it comes to generating vector representations of words, current language models are achieving high-quality results. However, what is not known is the extent to which knowledge about semantic relations is represented in the geometry of the semantic spaces created in this way. In order to answer this question, we study the relation geometry of such semantic spaces from three perspectives. We first examine whether words standing in a particular relation to a target word~(called relata) occupy the same region in semantic space, and whether the regions corresponding to different relations are distinct from each other. We then verify to what extent semantic spaces reflect certain well-known properties of relations, such as symmetry, asymmetry, and transitivity. Finally, we consider which information about the target words and relata is more important for relation geometry: their surface forms, or their contexts. We conduct experiments on six semantic relations using causal, masked, and diffusion language models. The results show that relata in asymmetric relations relatively clearly occupy a distinct region in semantic space. Asymmetric relations' properties are only moderately well encoded in the semantic space, yet better than those of symmetric ones. Furthermore, when considering the question which information source has the strongest impact on results amongst the models we evaluated, we find that lexical information tends to be more important for the causal language model, whereas contextual information is more important for the masked and diffusion language models. Our results empirically show that relation geometry is not equally well-represented for all relations in semantic space, suggesting that there is a difference in how well semantic relations might be learned from distributional information alone.
| Comments: | Manuscript under review |
| Subjects: | Computation and Language (cs.CL) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2607.26762 [cs.CL] |
| (or arXiv:2607.26762v1 [cs.CL] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.26762
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
|
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- TeX Source
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language
-
Latent Fact-Checking: Detecting Misinformation through Activation Engineering
Aug 10
-
Quantization Damage Is Multiplicative, Not Additive
Aug 10
-
Modular TTT: Rethinking Test-Time Training as Composable Modules
Aug 10
-
Trajectory-Relative Hindsight Distillation for Agentic Reinforcement Learning
Aug 10
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.