ProtStructQA: A Denotation Threshold in Protein Structural Reasoning
Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Computation and Language
Title:ProtStructQA: A Denotation Threshold in Protein Structural Reasoning
Abstract:Protein-language systems are often evaluated by whether they generate plausible biological text, but a structural question has a sharper semantics: it denotes a measurement in a 3D coordinate system. We introduce ProtStructQA, an executable benchmark for protein structural question answering in which each natural-language question is generated from a hidden typed domain-specific language (DSL) program and the answer is obtained by executing that program on an AlphaFold-predicted structure. ProtStructQA releases 382.2K questions covering confidence, distances, predicted aligned error (PAE), solvent exposure, secondary structure, topology and contacts, and held-out compositions: a 330K active benchmark over 10K proteins from four species, plus a 52.2K hard-negative robustness pool. Without fine-tuning, we evaluate Qwen3 models from 0.6B to 8B under direct prompting, chain-of-thought, grammar-constrained executable voting, executable voting with chain-of-thought, and multi-turn ReAct-style tool use, and replicate the headline finding on Gemma-3-1B and Gemma-3-12B. We find a capability-dependent denotation threshold between Qwen3-1.7B and Qwen3-4B: below it, tool-mediated ReAct dominates because models often fail to produce executable denotations; above it, chain-of-thought flips from mostly harmful to strongly beneficial and becomes the strongest strategy on most splits. Parse-failure and family-level analyses show that the threshold is a transition from unparseable language to executable structural denotation, while grammar and execution remain selectively valuable for PAE and secondary-structure queries. ProtStructQA reframes scientific QA as compilation from language to measurement and provides a diagnostic testbed for when language models can map words to executable 3D structural measurements.
| Subjects: | Computation and Language (cs.CL) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2606.00451 [cs.CL] |
| (or arXiv:2606.00451v1 [cs.CL] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.00451
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
|
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language
-
DraDDP: A Multimodal Multi-Party Dialogue Discourse Parsing Dataset
Jun 2
-
Toward Robust In-Context Learning: Leveraging Out-of-distribution Proxies for Target Inaccessible Demonstration Retrieval
Jun 2
-
AEyeDE: An Attention-Based Attribution Framework for AI-Generated Text Detection
Jun 2
-
CSRP: Chain-of-Thought Reasoning for Chinese Text Correction via Reinforcement Learning with Efficiency-Aware Rewards
Jun 2
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.