LexIssue: Benchmarking Legal Issue Identification in Chinese Civil Litigation
Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Computation and Language
Title:LexIssue: Benchmarking Legal Issue Identification in Chinese Civil Litigation
Abstract:Identifying the issues disputed between litigating parties is a crucial component of real-world litigation. However, legal issues remain comparatively underexplored in legal AI research. In this work, we study the computational modelling of legal issue identification in litigation. We introduce a legally grounded hierarchical schema that represents legal issues through both free-form issue descriptions and structured legal categories, and formulate legal issue identification as two complementary tasks: legal issue generation and legal issue classification. Based on this formulation, we construct LexIssue, a benchmark containing 430 real-world Chinese civil litigation cases and 1,303 expert-annotated disputed legal issues. We further develop an issue-centric legal knowledge base spanning 27 causes of action and 441 candidate legal issue entries to support retrieval-augmented reasoning. Experimental results across a diverse set of models show that retrieval-augmented generation using the constructed legal issue knowledge base consistently improves performance in identifying disputed legal issues and their corresponding legal attributes.
| Subjects: | Computation and Language (cs.CL) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2609.02954 [cs.CL] |
| (or arXiv:2609.02954v1 [cs.CL] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.02954
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
|
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
References & Citations
Bookmark
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language
-
Recognition, Simulation, and Refusal: A Contamination-Aware Study of Classic Psychological Effects in LLM Agents
Sep 22
-
Memory That Looks Forward: A Zero-Inference Prospective Term for Personal Memory Retrieval
Sep 22
-
Summarize, Judge, Refine: Decoupled Content Understanding and Policy Learning for Multimodal Content Moderation
Sep 22
-
AI-inferred expressed well-being and collective-action discourse in climate-change campaigns on X
Sep 22
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.