r/MachineLearning · · 1 min read

[R] Which LLMs are actually best for bleeding-edge Linux/ML debugging workflows in 2026? [R]

Mirrored from r/MachineLearning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

I’m trying to optimize an AI workflow for bleeding-edge Linux/ML debugging (Arch/CachyOS, CUDA, Python, unsloth, etc.).

Current stack:

- Claude = deep reasoning/mastermind

- Gemini 3.1 Pro = execution/logistics

- Perplexity = retrieval

Main problem: Gemini often gives high-friction or impractical fixes and degrades badly in long troubleshooting sessions. Example: suggested a long Podman workflow for an unsloth/Python issue where micromamba solved it much faster.

I also have access to hosted open models:

- Qwen 3 Coder 30B

- Qwen 3.5 122B

- Mistral Large 675B

- DeepSeek R1 Distill 70B

etc.

Question:

For people doing real-world Linux/ML/debugging workflows (not benchmarks), what currently works best as the “execution/logistics” model with strong web/recent-ecosystem awareness?

I care more about:

- practical fixes

- low friction

- stable long sessions

- debugging quality

than benchmark scores.

submitted by /u/minaco5mko
[link] [comments]

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from r/MachineLearning