arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language · · 3 min read

As Easy as Rocket Science: Assessing the Ability of Large Language Models to Interpret Negation in Figurative Language

Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Computation and Language

arXiv:2606.18922 (cs)
[Submitted on 17 Jun 2026]

Title:As Easy as Rocket Science: Assessing the Ability of Large Language Models to Interpret Negation in Figurative Language

View a PDF of the paper titled As Easy as Rocket Science: Assessing the Ability of Large Language Models to Interpret Negation in Figurative Language, by Jasmine Owers and 2 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Figurative language and negation are two areas that challenge current language models, however, both are widely used throughout written and spoken language. Large language models (LLMs) are also widely used in everyday contexts where they cannot necessarily be tuned for a specific dataset. It is therefore essential to understand the ability of LLMs to correctly interpret text that includes both negation and figurative language. To investigate this, we develop a set of new annotations to an existing dataset of figurative language, and test a range of language models on the dataset. We find that the combination of negation and figurativeness can present a particular challenge, and that performance overall and across different negation types is particularly dependent on the prompt style used.
Comments: 16 pages, 16 figures; for associated code and data see this https URL To be published in Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics
Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
MSC classes: 68T50
ACM classes: I.2.7
Cite as: arXiv:2606.18922 [cs.CL]
  (or arXiv:2606.18922v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.18922
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Jasmine Owers [view email]
[v1] Wed, 17 Jun 2026 10:50:05 UTC (1,504 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled As Easy as Rocket Science: Assessing the Ability of Large Language Models to Interpret Negation in Figurative Language, by Jasmine Owers and 2 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source

Current browse context:

cs.CL
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language