arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language · · 3 min read

MemoryDocDataSet: A Benchmark for Joint Conversational Memory and Long Document Reasoning

Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Computation and Language

arXiv:2606.04442 (cs)
[Submitted on 3 Jun 2026]

Title:MemoryDocDataSet: A Benchmark for Joint Conversational Memory and Long Document Reasoning

View a PDF of the paper titled MemoryDocDataSet: A Benchmark for Joint Conversational Memory and Long Document Reasoning, by Qiyang Xie and 6 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:AI systems increasingly need to combine two demanding capabilities: navigating multi-session conversation history and performing deep reading comprehension within long documents. Yet no existing benchmark evaluates both simultaneously. We introduce MemoryDocDataSet, a synthetic benchmark of 50 micro-worlds and 1,000 QA pairs in which each instance comprises 3-5 personas, a temporal event graph spanning months of activity, 3-5 real long documents (20,000-50,000 tokens each sourced from the Caselaw Access Project), multi-session conversations grounded on those documents, and 20 question-answer pairs across five reasoning categories. The defining feature is the Hybrid source tag: questions requiring a system to first navigate conversation history to identify which document is relevant, then extract the answer from within that document. Hybrid questions account for 75.1% of the dataset. Dataset quality is characterised through a prompt-sensitivity self-consistency analysis using LLM-as-judge, yielding a median Cohen's $\kappa = 0.634$ across all 50 micro-worlds. We evaluate six baseline configurations spanning truncated context, long-context LLMs, retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), and memory systems. The best baseline (RAG-Both) achieves 0.358 overall F1 and 0.342 on Hybrid. Document-only retrieval (RAG-Doc) collapses to 0.267 on Hybrid despite achieving 0.453 on Doc-only questions, demonstrating a clear joint-retrieval gap that motivates architectures unifying conversational memory with long-document navigation. We release the dataset, generation pipeline, and all baseline implementations.
Comments: 17 pages, 2 figures, 8 tables. Submitted for peer review
Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2606.04442 [cs.CL]
  (or arXiv:2606.04442v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.04442
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Qiyang Xie [view email]
[v1] Wed, 3 Jun 2026 04:44:50 UTC (86 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled MemoryDocDataSet: A Benchmark for Joint Conversational Memory and Long Document Reasoning, by Qiyang Xie and 6 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source

Current browse context:

cs.CL
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language