Quantifying the Impact of Translation Errors on Multilingual LLM Evaluation
Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Computation and Language
Title:Quantifying the Impact of Translation Errors on Multilingual LLM Evaluation
Abstract:Machine-translated benchmarks are widely used to assess the multilingual capabilities of large language models (LLMs), yet translation errors in these benchmarks remain underexplored, raising concerns about the reliability and comparability of multilingual evaluation. We address two practical gaps: (i) how well automatic MQM-style error spans from LLM judges and a span-aware QE baseline (xCOMET-XXL) match expert human span annotations on benchmark translations, and (ii) how strongly translation errors (as opposed to source-side issues in the English original) explain accuracy drops on translated benchmarks. We find that span agreement is non-trivial on naturally occurring benchmark translations, and that target-side translation errors are consistently associated with measurable, percentage-point drops in translated accuracy even after controlling for English correctness and source-side anomalies.
| Subjects: | Computation and Language (cs.CL) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2605.24904 [cs.CL] |
| (or arXiv:2605.24904v1 [cs.CL] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.24904
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
|
Submission history
From: Klaudia-Doris Thellmann [view email][v1] Sun, 24 May 2026 07:06:34 UTC (1,230 KB)
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language
-
Document Classification Pattern Recognition via Information Fusion: A Systematic Review of Multimodal and Multiview Representation Approaches
May 26
-
Raon-Speech Technical Report
May 26
-
Multi-Persona Debate System for Automated Scientific Hypothesis Generation
May 26
-
Improving the Completeness and Comparability of Segment Disclosures: A Large Language Model Approach
May 26
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.