Document Classification Pattern Recognition via Information Fusion: A Systematic Review of Multimodal and Multiview Representation Approaches
Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Computation and Language
Title:Document Classification Pattern Recognition via Information Fusion: A Systematic Review of Multimodal and Multiview Representation Approaches
Abstract:Information fusion is used widely to improve document classification by the integration of multiple data sources (multimodal) or representations (multiview). However, the field lacks a unified framework, a quantitative synthesis of its effectiveness, and clear guidance for practitioners. This systematic review addresses these gaps by analysing 139 primary studies. It introduces a formal framework to structure the field, presents the results of a qualitative analysis to identify key trends, and performs a random-effects meta-analysis (to our knowledge, the first focused on document classification) to quantify performance gains. Our meta-analysis reveals that multimodal fusion improves accuracy (mean gain of +5.28 percentage points, $p=0.0016$) significantly -- the F1-score effect is directionally positive but statistically non-significant in our primary model. Multiview fusion provides consistent but modest gains for accuracy (+4.67\%), F1-score (+3.08\%), and recall (all $p<0.05$). Critically, our qualitative synthesis uncovers challenges in reproducibility in methodological rigour: only 11.8\% (multimodal) and 23.3\% (multiview) of the studies use statistical tests to validate their findings, which undermines the reliability of many of their results. This review's primary contributions are a unifying framework, the first quantitative evidence base, and data-driven guidelines. This review concludes that successful information fusion depends not on algorithmic complexity, but on the strategic alignment of the fusion method with the task context and a commitment to more rigorous validation.
| Subjects: | Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2605.23910 [cs.CL] |
| (or arXiv:2605.23910v1 [cs.CL] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.23910
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
|
Submission history
From: Marcin Mirończuk Mirończuk [view email][v1] Tue, 7 Apr 2026 08:49:20 UTC (2,208 KB)
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- TeX Source
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language
-
Raon-Speech Technical Report
May 26
-
Multi-Persona Debate System for Automated Scientific Hypothesis Generation
May 26
-
Improving the Completeness and Comparability of Segment Disclosures: A Large Language Model Approach
May 26
-
EchoDistill:Alignment Noisy-to-Clean Self-Distillation for Robust Audio LLMs
May 26
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.