arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language · · 3 min read

Investigating LLM's Problem Solving Capability -- a Study on Statics Questions

Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Computation and Language

arXiv:2606.26103 (cs)
[Submitted on 30 Apr 2026]

Title:Investigating LLM's Problem Solving Capability -- a Study on Statics Questions

View a PDF of the paper titled Investigating LLM's Problem Solving Capability -- a Study on Statics Questions, by Tanner Culleton and Hung-Fu Chang
View PDF
Abstract:Large Language Models (LLMs) have rapidly influenced many aspects of society, particularly education, due to their demonstrated ability to complete assignments and examinations across a wide range of subjects. Although prior studies have examined the educational impact of LLMs, much of the existing work relies on public or open problem datasets and lacks topic-specific analysis. In engineering education, especially within mechanical engineering, systematic investigations of LLM performance on specific problem types remain limited. Instead of using traditional methods that directly ask textbook questions to an LLM tool, our study adopts a model distillation process to evaluate LLM capabilities in solving statics problems. By distilling ChatGPT, we extracted 25 text-only statics questions and further constructed two additional datasets by adding diagrams and modifying their numerical values. Experimental results show that while LLMs perform well on text-only statics problems, their accuracy decreases when diagrams are introduced and the problems require multi-step reasoning. Further analysis suggests that this performance drop is not primarily caused by limitations in image recognition, but rather by difficulties in multi-step reasoning and in consistently applying extracted visual information across successive solution stages.
Comments: 9 pages, Engineering and Technology Symposium 2026
Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2606.26103 [cs.CL]
  (or arXiv:2606.26103v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.26103
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Hung-Fu Chang [view email]
[v1] Thu, 30 Apr 2026 20:17:09 UTC (791 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Investigating LLM's Problem Solving Capability -- a Study on Statics Questions, by Tanner Culleton and Hung-Fu Chang
  • View PDF

Current browse context:

cs.CL
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language