arXiv — Machine Learning · · 3 min read

On the Identifiability of Controlled World Models

Mirrored from arXiv — Machine Learning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Machine Learning

arXiv:2607.22430 (cs)
[Submitted on 24 Jul 2026]

Title:On the Identifiability of Controlled World Models

View a PDF of the paper titled On the Identifiability of Controlled World Models, by Xiangteng Zhang and 4 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Learning world models that infer environment dynamics from high-dimensional observations and predict outcomes under candidate actions is central to planning and control. Joint-Embedding Predictive Architectures (JEPAs) provide a compelling framework for learning such models in representation space. Recent action-conditioned extensions perform promisingly in visual control and latent-space planning, but leave a fundamental question unresolved: when does controlled latent prediction identify both the underlying state and the controlled dynamics? This is challenging under nonlinear observations and behavior policies with limited conditional action variation, where state-dependent evolution and action effects can be statistically confounded. We establish a joint identifiability theory for controlled world models with Gaussian latent states under state-dependent Gaussian behavior policies. We identify two policy-dependent conditions: spectral separation of the predictable signal governs representation identifiability, while non-degenerate conditional action variation governs transition identifiability. We prove that when both conditions hold, every global minimizer of the JEPA objective identifies the latent state and controlled transition up to an orthogonal transformation. We further derive quantitative bounds on representation and transition identifiability under approximate optimization. Finally, we construct predictor perturbations along weakly excited action directions whose counterfactual-to-on-policy error ratio is the inverse transition-identifiability margin, revealing the cost of limited action coverage. Experiments across nonlinear observation maps and behavior policies corroborate the theory and demonstrate implications for transition identifiability, counterfactual prediction, and goal-conditioned latent planning.
Subjects: Machine Learning (cs.LG)
Cite as: arXiv:2607.22430 [cs.LG]
  (or arXiv:2607.22430v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.22430
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Xiangteng Zhang [view email]
[v1] Fri, 24 Jul 2026 15:49:12 UTC (4,653 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

Current browse context:

cs.LG
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv recommender toggle
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — Machine Learning