Epidemiology of Model Collapse: Modeling Synthetic Data Contamination via Bilayer SIR Dynamics
Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Computation and Language
Title:Epidemiology of Model Collapse: Modeling Synthetic Data Contamination via Bilayer SIR Dynamics
Abstract:Training on synthetic data causes model collapse, but existing analyses treat this as single-chain degradation. In reality, the AI ecosystem involves cross-contamination: models ingest synthetic data from other models, produce new synthetic text, and contaminate shared corpora. We propose a bilayer coupled SIR/SIRS framework -- a phenomenological mean-field model treating data corpora and AI models as two interacting populations, each with susceptible, infected, and recovered compartments linked by cross-layer transmission. The SIRS variant (our primary recommendation) incorporates immunity waning, reflecting that filtered corpora and retrained models remain susceptible to re-contamination. We derive the basic reproduction number $R_0 = \sqrt{\beta_D \beta_M / [(\gamma_D+\mu_D)(\gamma_M+\mu_M)]}$ via the Next Generation Matrix and apply standard epidemic threshold results to the bilayer system. Illustrative scenario-based calibration from public AI text prevalence data yields supercritical dynamics ($R_0 > 1$) across three scenarios; Sobol sensitivity analysis identifies synthetic-text detection as the highest-leverage parameter. A bipartite-network agent-based model confirms mean-field consistency ($R^2 > 0.96$) for dense networks but degrades under heterogeneity. GPT-2 contamination chain experiments (192 runs across WikiText and Shakespeare) show dose-response degradation and diversity loss qualitatively consistent with the threshold picture. Matched-budget source-diversity experiments (1,088 runs) provide suggestive evidence that multi-source mixing modestly attenuates collapse, but the effect vanishes at lower contamination fractions. Intervention analysis identifies detection-based filtering and herd immunity as the highest-leverage strategies.
| Comments: | 24 pages, 15 figures |
| Subjects: | Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG) |
| MSC classes: | 92D30, 68T07 |
| ACM classes: | I.2.6; I.6.5 |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2606.05168 [cs.CL] |
| (or arXiv:2606.05168v1 [cs.CL] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.05168
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
|
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
Current browse context:
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language
-
Predict and Reconstruct: Joint Objectives for Self-Supervised Language Representation Learning
Jun 5
-
Improving Heart-Focused Medical Question Answering in LLMs via Variance-Aware Rubric Rewards with GRPO
Jun 5
-
Generic Triple-Latent Compression with Gated Associative Retrieval
Jun 5
-
PEFT of SLM for Telecommunications Customer Support: A Comparative Study of LoRA Configurations with Energy Consumption Analysis
Jun 5
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.