Structural Negative Transfer in Federated Graph Neural Networks: Diagnosis, Causal Investigation, and the Limits of Divergence-Aware Mitigation
Mirrored from arXiv — Machine Learning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Machine Learning
arXiv:2609.16977 (cs)
[Submitted on 15 Sep 2026]
Title:Structural Negative Transfer in Federated Graph Neural Networks: Diagnosis, Causal Investigation, and the Limits of Divergence-Aware Mitigation
View a PDF of the paper titled Structural Negative Transfer in Federated Graph Neural Networks: Diagnosis, Causal Investigation, and the Limits of Divergence-Aware Mitigation, by Chethana Prasad Kabgere and 1 other authors
View PDF
HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Federated learning lets multiple participants train a shared model without pooling raw data, by exchanging locally trained model updates instead. Federated averaging assumes that averaging local models is a reasonable way to solve one shared problem when participants' data are broadly similar. Work on non-IID federated learning has shown that this assumption can withstand differences in label and feature distributions. We ask whether it survives a different strain specific to graph neural networks, where client graphs differ not in label or feature distribution but in structure itself, requiring the same shared weights to operate over fundamentally different topologies. We call the resulting harm structural negative transfer. In a federation of real citation networks and synthetic structural proxies, a structurally atypical client lost more than half its achievable accuracy simply by joining. In an initial six-client federation, two label-free structural statistics computable before training were strongly associated with this harm. Expanding to twenty clients showed that degree divergence remained associated with harm, although more weakly, and survived removal of domain contrast. Spectral divergence did not replicate, which we trace to a confound caused by the composition of the reference pool used for leave-one-out statistics. A causal intervention isolating topology found no significant effect. A degree-normalization mechanism held across twenty-four seeds but did not explain the harm when corrected. The best of five candidate fixes beat a tuned baseline only until a matched, structurally blind control was applied, after which the gain disappeared. What survives is a modest, partially replicated, degree-specific signal that is not yet a validated predictor at scale.
| Comments: | Working Paper Draft |
| Subjects: | Machine Learning (cs.LG); Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing (cs.DC) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2609.16977 [cs.LG] |
| (or arXiv:2609.16977v1 [cs.LG] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.16977
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
|
Submission history
From: Chethana Prasad Kabgere Ms. [view email][v1] Tue, 15 Sep 2026 10:53:31 UTC (1,257 KB)
Full-text links:
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
View a PDF of the paper titled Structural Negative Transfer in Federated Graph Neural Networks: Diagnosis, Causal Investigation, and the Limits of Divergence-Aware Mitigation, by Chethana Prasad Kabgere and 1 other authors
References & Citations
Loading...
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Recommenders and Search Tools
Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv recommender toggle
IArxiv Recommender
(What is IArxiv?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
More from arXiv — Machine Learning
-
Stable and Faithful Explanations for Knowledge Tracing
Sep 25
-
SMILESGNN: Interpretable Clinical Toxicity Prediction via SMILES-Graph Cross-Attention Fusion
Sep 25
-
CFD Correction of Open Tip Clearance Flow in a Compressor Cascade Using VAE Latent Space Adaptation
Sep 25
-
CARE: Condition-Aware Representation Regularization for Diffusion Models
Sep 25
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.