arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language · · 3 min read

RADAR: Rubric-Aware Dependency and Redundancy Analysis for LLM-as-Judge Evaluation

Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Computation and Language

arXiv:2608.01810 (cs)
[Submitted on 3 Aug 2026]

Title:RADAR: Rubric-Aware Dependency and Redundancy Analysis for LLM-as-Judge Evaluation

View a PDF of the paper titled RADAR: Rubric-Aware Dependency and Redundancy Analysis for LLM-as-Judge Evaluation, by Divyansh Singh and 2 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Rubric-based LLM-as-judge pipelines often assume that evaluation criteria provide independent signals. In practice, however, criteria can be behaviorally coupled: improving one criterion may systematically change scores on another, distorting aggregate scores used in model-release or product-update decisions. We introduce RADAR, a lightweight preflight diagnostic framework for estimating such coupling before large-scale evaluation. Given a rubric, RADAR generates targeted synthetic probes, scores each probe on all criteria, and produces a directional coupling matrix that shows which criteria co-score and how. We validate RADAR on three industry-relevant evaluation settings: NVIDIA HelpSteer2, SumPubMed, and the Yale-Salesforce SummEval benchmark. Using only a small number of probes per criterion, RADAR recovers human inter-criterion correlation structure (Pearson r > 0.84) and provides practitioners with concrete audit signals about redundancy, hierarchy, and aggregation sensitivity before committing to large-scale judging.
Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL)
Cite as: arXiv:2608.01810 [cs.CL]
  (or arXiv:2608.01810v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.01810
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Divyansh Singh [view email]
[v1] Mon, 3 Aug 2026 07:21:32 UTC (5,960 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled RADAR: Rubric-Aware Dependency and Redundancy Analysis for LLM-as-Judge Evaluation, by Divyansh Singh and 2 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source

Current browse context:

cs.CL
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language