arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language · · 3 min read

When Clipping Reverses Correction: Failure Dynamics of Pointwise Forward-KL On-Policy Self-Distillation

Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Computation and Language

arXiv:2609.38995 (cs)
[Submitted on 30 Sep 2026]

Title:When Clipping Reverses Correction: Failure Dynamics of Pointwise Forward-KL On-Policy Self-Distillation

View a PDF of the paper titled When Clipping Reverses Correction: Failure Dynamics of Pointwise Forward-KL On-Policy Self-Distillation, by Di Huang and 3 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:On-policy self-distillation (OPSD) trains a student on its own generated responses using feedback from the same model conditioned on privileged information. On mathematical reasoning, the original OPSD study finds that stylistic tokens can dominate the training signal over math-related tokens, and that pointwise clipping of the forward KL objective stabilizes training. Pointwise clipping caps each vocabulary-wise forward KL term at a fixed threshold before summing over the vocabulary. Follow-up studies have adopted this clipping, but its effect on training has not been directly examined. In matched training runs differing only in whether clipping is applied, we observe that clipped runs produce substantially more repetitions that persist to the end of the response than their unclipped counterparts. We trace this failure to the clipped objective. We prove that the clipped objective can fail to correct the student toward the teacher and can instead push clipped and unclipped token probabilities away from its teacher. Our training runs agree with this analysis: inside repetitions, the clipped student places less probability than its teacher on leaving the repetition, and more on continuing it, whereas the unclipped runs stay close to their teachers.
Comments: 21 pages, 5 figures
Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL)
Cite as: arXiv:2609.38995 [cs.CL]
  (or arXiv:2609.38995v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.38995
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Di Huang [view email]
[v1] Wed, 30 Sep 2026 05:10:59 UTC (325 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled When Clipping Reverses Correction: Failure Dynamics of Pointwise Forward-KL On-Policy Self-Distillation, by Di Huang and 3 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source

Current browse context:

cs.CL
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language