arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language · · 3 min read

Unifying Conformal Language Tasks with In-Context Ensembles

Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Computation and Language

arXiv:2609.03005 (cs)
[Submitted on 2 Sep 2026]

Title:Unifying Conformal Language Tasks with In-Context Ensembles

View a PDF of the paper titled Unifying Conformal Language Tasks with In-Context Ensembles, by Xiao Shi Huang and 4 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Many NLP tasks, such as summarization and extractive question answering, reduce to retrieving relevant content from documents under two constraints: coverage, retaining enough pertinent information to achieve some goal, and conciseness, removing as much irrelevant information as possible. Conformal prediction methods have been used to guarantee coverage, and must be optimized for conciseness through design of a score function. State-of-the-art scoring functions use hand-engineered LLM prompts asking the model to rate the importance of content, but manual prompt engineering is labor-intensive and task-specific. We introduce the Conformal Relevance framework which uses in-context learning example curation and ensembling to create a score function which maintains coverage while improving conciseness with minimal manual input. We demonstrate this framework's application on seven NLP tasks, and also theoretically study the impact of diversity for ensembled conformal scores, giving a complementarity condition that characterizes when ensembling improves worst-case sentence scores, and a saturation bound on ensemble improvement.
Comments: Findings of EMNLP 2026. Code is available at this https URL
Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Machine Learning (stat.ML)
Cite as: arXiv:2609.03005 [cs.CL]
  (or arXiv:2609.03005v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.03005
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Jesse Cresswell [view email]
[v1] Wed, 2 Sep 2026 18:00:01 UTC (483 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

Current browse context:

cs.CL
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language