Multi-Modal Generative Fuzzy System: Fuzzy Inference Guided Large Model Interactive Question Answering Framework
Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Computation and Language
Title:Multi-Modal Generative Fuzzy System: Fuzzy Inference Guided Large Model Interactive Question Answering Framework
Abstract:In Multimodal Question Answering (MQA), models are required to jointly encode and integrate heterogeneous information from multiple modalities, including text, images, and speech, to perform complex semantic reasoning and decision making. Despite recent advances, existing approaches, including traditional deep learning models and Large Models (LMs) or prompt-based frameworks, continue to face several critical challenges. First, modality bias arises from discrepancies in feature distributions across different modalities, which limits effective cross modal collaborative understanding. Second, many questions require knowledge drawn from multiple domains, introducing significant uncertainty. Third, current methods often rely on shallow semantic matching, resulting in limited reasoning depth an reduced interpretability. To address these issues, inspired by the traditional fuzzy system (FS) framework, we propose a fuzzy-inference-guided multimodal generative architecture termed the Multi-Modal Generative Fuzzy System (MMGFS). The main contributions of MMGFS are two folds. First, it alleviates modality bias through a multimodal collaborative rumination mechanism. Second, it introduces fuzzy rules and a multi-hop inference mechanism to support cross-domain knowledge fusion and hierarchical reasoning, thereby strengthening uncertainty modelling and deepening semantic understanding. We conduct comprehensive evaluations on open-domain question answering datasets, including MultimodalQA and WebQA, as well as domain-specific benchmarks, including BioMol-VQA and EHRxQA. Experimental results demonstrate that MMGFS consistently outperforms existing methods across multiple datasets. It effectively mitigates modality bias and question uncertainty while achieving superior performance in answer accuracy, consistency, and generalization.
| Comments: | 13 pages, 8 figures |
| Subjects: | Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2608.14584 [cs.CL] |
| (or arXiv:2608.14584v1 [cs.CL] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.14584
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
|
Access Paper:
- View PDF
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language
-
DeltaMomentum: A Key-Value based Anisotropic Momentum Update via Delta Rule
Aug 21
-
Truncate Bad, Upweight Good: BoN-Style Distillation via Rank-Based Classification
Aug 21
-
Credit Without Ground Truth: Auditing Step-Level Credit Assignment in LLM Agents Against Executed Replay
Aug 21
-
MileGPO: Milestone Inference with Local Evidence for Graph-Based Policy Optimization of Long-Horizon LLM Agents
Aug 21
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.