arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language · · 3 min read

StepJack: Benchmarking Computer-Use Agent Safety Against Multi-Step Indirect Prompt Injection

Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Cryptography and Security

arXiv:2608.06477 (cs)
[Submitted on 6 Aug 2026]

Title:StepJack: Benchmarking Computer-Use Agent Safety Against Multi-Step Indirect Prompt Injection

View a PDF of the paper titled StepJack: Benchmarking Computer-Use Agent Safety Against Multi-Step Indirect Prompt Injection, by Zhuoxin Zhan and 4 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Computer-use agents (CUAs) face a growing threat from indirect prompt injection, where adversarial instructions are planted in the environment such as web pages. In this paper, we introduce multi-step indirect prompt injection, a new attack class against CUAs in which the adversarial goal is decomposed into multiple innocuous-looking sub-steps and distributed across a chain of pages referenced along the agent's navigation path. We develop a pipeline to automatically decompose an adversarial goal under the constraint that the execution of the decomposed sub-steps must achieve the original goal while optimizing the innocuousness of each decomposed sub-step. With this pipeline, we build StepJack, a CUA safety benchmark with 480 test examples. On this benchmark, we evaluate six state-of-the-art CUAs and find that at a fixed decomposition depth, multi-step attacks raise attack success rate (ASR) on three of six CUAs, by up to 31.2 points (e.g., GPT-5.4-mini: 41.7% at single-step to 72.9% at three-step); averaged over the five CUAs that can reliably follow the reference chain (all but EvoCUA-32B), ASR rises from 31.3% at single-step to 36.9% at three-step. Dataset and code are available at this https URL.
Subjects: Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL)
Cite as: arXiv:2608.06477 [cs.CR]
  (or arXiv:2608.06477v1 [cs.CR] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.06477
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Zhuoxin Zhan [view email]
[v1] Thu, 6 Aug 2026 18:14:30 UTC (2,443 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled StepJack: Benchmarking Computer-Use Agent Safety Against Multi-Step Indirect Prompt Injection, by Zhuoxin Zhan and 4 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source

Current browse context:

cs.CR
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language