Mechanics of Bias and Reasoning: Interpreting the Impact of Chain-of-Thought Prompting on Gender Bias in LLMs
Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Computation and Language
Title:Mechanics of Bias and Reasoning: Interpreting the Impact of Chain-of-Thought Prompting on Gender Bias in LLMs
Abstract:Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in socially sensitive settings despite substantial documentation that they encode gender biases. Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting has been proposed as a bias-mitigation approach. However, existing evaluations primarily focus on changes in LLM benchmark performance, providing limited insight into whether apparent bias reductions reflect meaningful changes in a model's internal mechanisms. In this work, we investigate how CoT prompting affects gender bias in LLMs, combining benchmark-based evaluation with mechanistic interpretability techniques and reasoning chain failure analysis. Our results confirm a stereotypical bias present in LLM outputs across benchmarks, showing that CoT prompting does not consistently reduce the bias gap. Mechanistic analyses reveal that although CoT balances biased behavior in certain attention head clusters, gender bias remains embedded in hidden representations, indicating only superficial mitigation. Inspection of reasoning chains further suggests that these improvements stem from memorization and familiarity with the dataset rather than genuine understanding of bias.
| Comments: | 24 pages, 6 figures, including appendix. Accepted at the ICLR 2026 Workshop on Algorithmic Fairness Across Alignment Procedures and Agentic Systems. Submitted to COLM 2026 |
| Subjects: | Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2605.20410 [cs.CL] |
| (or arXiv:2605.20410v1 [cs.CL] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.20410
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
|
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language
-
Shiny Stories, Hidden Struggles: Investigating the Representation of Disability Through the Lens of LLMs
May 21
-
Leveraging Large Language Models for Sentiment Analysis: Multi-Modal Analysis of Decentraland's MANA Token
May 21
-
Improving Quantized Model Performance in Qualitative Analysis with Multi-Pass Prompt Verification
May 21
-
Parallel LLM Reasoning for Bias-Resilient, Robust Conceptual Abstraction
May 21
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.