arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language · · 4 min read

No Detectable Change in Side-Level WER from Prompt-Level Context: A Preregistered Ablation on a Production Oral-History Corpus

Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Computation and Language

arXiv:2608.28875 (cs)
[Submitted on 28 Aug 2026]

Title:No Detectable Change in Side-Level WER from Prompt-Level Context: A Preregistered Ablation on a Production Oral-History Corpus

View a PDF of the paper titled No Detectable Change in Side-Level WER from Prompt-Level Context: A Preregistered Ablation on a Production Oral-History Corpus, by Theodore O. Cochran and 2 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Supplying context at inference time to a large multimodal model is an inexpensive lever for adapting speech transcription to a domain, and earlier results on smaller models reported large gains. This work tested that mechanism where it ships, in the prompt-conditioning layer of a production oral-history transcription tool, on a sample from its own production corpus. Full prompt-level context did not detectably change side-level word error rate (WER), and none of the four preregistered hypotheses was supported. The design was a within-item paired ablation, preregistered with the analysis code frozen by hash before the confirmatory batch was scored; two disclosed gpt-4o pilot sides had been scored earlier, during scorer development. Nineteen cassette sides, about 10.6 hours of degraded 1970s-80s interview audio, were reprocessed through the production code path under three prompt arms, crossed with two deployed commercial configurations, gpt-4o-transcribe and gemini-2.5-flash, and scored against operator-corrected verbatim references. For gpt-4o-transcribe the median paired difference between the full-context and no-context arms was +0.6 WER points, with a side-resampled interval of [-1.1, +1.0]; the Gemini estimates were too unstable to support a comparable negative inference. A post-hoc rerun found run-to-run pipeline variability larger than the confirmatory differences, so effects of that size cannot be resolved from one transcription per cell. An implementation audit verified the manipulation was live, and sequence-alignment analysis found a small improvement on complete context-listed phrases, too small to materially change side-level WER, and for Gemini coexisting with worsened unlisted-token error. Evaluating context mechanisms therefore requires sequence-aligned term-level, insertion, and speaker-label measures alongside aggregate accuracy.
Comments: 31 pages, 1 figure. Preregistered on OSF (this https URL, DOI https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/NS49B%29%3B release materials and dated provider-documentation snapshots in the study component (this https URL)
Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Sound (cs.SD)
Cite as: arXiv:2608.28875 [cs.CL]
  (or arXiv:2608.28875v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.28875
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Theodore Cochran [view email]
[v1] Fri, 28 Aug 2026 21:26:35 UTC (347 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled No Detectable Change in Side-Level WER from Prompt-Level Context: A Preregistered Ablation on a Production Oral-History Corpus, by Theodore O. Cochran and 2 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source

Current browse context:

cs.CL
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language