arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language · · 3 min read

Evaluating OpenAI's Privacy Filter: Cross-Lingual, Cross-Domain PII Detection Across 42 Benchmarks

Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Computation and Language

arXiv:2608.02616 (cs)
[Submitted on 23 May 2026]

Title:Evaluating OpenAI's Privacy Filter: Cross-Lingual, Cross-Domain PII Detection Across 42 Benchmarks

View a PDF of the paper titled Evaluating OpenAI's Privacy Filter: Cross-Lingual, Cross-Domain PII Detection Across 42 Benchmarks, by Rohith Uppala
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:We present the first independent, systematic evaluation of OpenAI's Privacy Filter (OPF), a 1.5B-parameter bidirectional PII detector, across 42 synthetic benchmarks spanning 22 languages and 5 domains. Zero-shot, OPF achieves F1=0.855 on AI4Privacy and 0.464 on SPY medical, outperforming Presidio (0.431, 0.273) and XLM-RoBERTa (0.269, 0.111) on PII-annotated benchmarks; on multilingual NER, XLM-RoBERTa leads OPF on all 13 Indic and non-Latin languages. GPT-4o leads on medical, legal, and financial PII (SPY: 0.643 avg, Gretel: 0.527), while OPF leads on structured synthetic PII (0.71 avg) and customer support (0.60). OPF degrades sharply when PII is embedded in narrative prose: F1=0.04--0.57 on NER benchmarks and collapse for non-Latin scripts (Arabic: 0.04, Cyrillic: 0.03). Error analysis shows OPF is strongest on structurally regular PII types (email: 0.78, phone: 0.76) and weakest on culturally variable ones (person: 0.40, address: 0.49), and is recall-biased on customer-support and medical/legal PII (P=0.31--0.54, R=0.70--0.85); global precision spans 0.31--0.86 across all domains.
Comments: 11 pages, 5 tables; evaluation of a production PII detection system
Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2608.02616 [cs.CL]
  (or arXiv:2608.02616v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.02616
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Rohith Uppala [view email]
[v1] Sat, 23 May 2026 16:59:01 UTC (30 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

Current browse context:

cs.CL
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language