arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language · · 3 min read

A Semiotics-Aware Framework for Evaluating Fidelity and Coverage in Natural Language Generation

Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Computation and Language

arXiv:2609.26527 (cs)
[Submitted on 22 Sep 2026]

Title:A Semiotics-Aware Framework for Evaluating Fidelity and Coverage in Natural Language Generation

View a PDF of the paper titled A Semiotics-Aware Framework for Evaluating Fidelity and Coverage in Natural Language Generation, by Lorenzo Zangari and Davide Picca
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:When two texts describe the same expression, standard metrics based on lexical overlap or whole-text similarity may fail to detect meaningful differences in how that expression is framed. We propose a framework to evaluate semiotic alignment between texts, where a semiotic profile encompasses both the contextual meaning and the discourse references made salient by a text. Our approach yields two scores, Semiotic Fidelity and Semiotic Coverage, estimating how much of one text's profile is supported by the other and how much of the other's profile it recovers. Experiments show that coverage is typically lower than fidelity, and that alignment between LLMs and human-curated data is highest at low sampling temperatures, while higher temperatures reduce this alignment.
Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2609.26527 [cs.CL]
  (or arXiv:2609.26527v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.26527
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Lorenzo Zangari [view email]
[v1] Tue, 22 Sep 2026 14:52:06 UTC (23,287 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled A Semiotics-Aware Framework for Evaluating Fidelity and Coverage in Natural Language Generation, by Lorenzo Zangari and Davide Picca
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source

Current browse context:

cs.CL
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language