arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language · · 3 min read

A Channel-Boosted Multi-Agent System with Iterative Consultation for Document Sensitivity Classification

Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Computation and Language

arXiv:2609.22212 (cs)
[Submitted on 2 Sep 2026]

Title:A Channel-Boosted Multi-Agent System with Iterative Consultation for Document Sensitivity Classification

View a PDF of the paper titled A Channel-Boosted Multi-Agent System with Iterative Consultation for Document Sensitivity Classification, by Aleesha Zainab and 3 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Organizations in critical national infrastructure sectors must assess heterogeneous documents for sensitivity before routing or storage. Manual assessment is slow, inconsistent, and unscalable. Extending our prior leakage-controlled benchmark, BERT established the top single-encoder baseline (89.14% accuracy, 89.33% F1-score under 5-fold cross-validation on the Strategic 16K corpus). However, transformer baselines suffer from a structural limitation: fixed input length truncation discards evidence beyond the retained window-precisely where sensitive cables tend to be longest. We present Channel-Boosted MAS (CB-MAS) and instantiate it as IC-MAS (Iterative Consultation Multi-Agent System) to solve this without long-context computational costs. A Channel Critic Agent learns document-adaptive trust weights governing Gated Channel Boosting between two first-window encoders, while paired Consultation Agents iteratively exchange belief states to reconcile evidence from the beginning and end of long documents. IC-MAS holds computation constant regardless of document length by reconciling fixed windows in a compact representation space. Ablation studies show critic-controlled Channel Boosting provides the bulk of accuracy gains, while consultation recovers recall without precision collapse. Critic-Controlled Gated Channel Boosting with Max-Pool fusion and Blackboard Adaptive Consultation achieves 90.72% accuracy, 91.23% F1-score, 92.01% sensitive recall, and 90.46% sensitive precision, using about 54% less average computation than a fixed-round baseline. Gains over the single-encoder baseline are statistically significant (McNemar's test, p less than 0.000001; paired t-test). We include LIME/SHAP explainability, multi-agent evaluation, and an honest accounting of limitations.
Comments: 30 pages , 12 figures
Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Multiagent Systems (cs.MA)
MSC classes: 68T50 (Primary) 68T42, 68P27 (Secondary)
Cite as: arXiv:2609.22212 [cs.CL]
  (or arXiv:2609.22212v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.22212
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Asifullah Khan [view email]
[v1] Wed, 2 Sep 2026 03:43:08 UTC (8,603 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled A Channel-Boosted Multi-Agent System with Iterative Consultation for Document Sensitivity Classification, by Aleesha Zainab and 3 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source

Current browse context:

cs.CL
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language