arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language · · 3 min read

When Steering Fails in Latent Reasoning: A Latent-to-Language Transition Gap

Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Computation and Language

arXiv:2609.21662 (cs)
[Submitted on 18 Sep 2026]

Title:When Steering Fails in Latent Reasoning: A Latent-to-Language Transition Gap

View a PDF of the paper titled When Steering Fails in Latent Reasoning: A Latent-to-Language Transition Gap, by Gaoxiang Huang and 1 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Activation steering has become a widely used approach for controlling language models during explicit chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning, motivating its extension to latent CoT. However, we find that steering continuous thoughts produces substantially weaker effects on subsequent language generation than steering explicit CoT, even when the hidden representations are moved by comparable amounts. We first show that task information remains identifiable in continuous thoughts. Hence, we hypothesize a \textbf{latent-to-language transition gap}, in which an intervention effect in latent space fails to transfer to language generation. Two further results support this hypothesis: the output distribution changes abruptly at the transition boundary, and task-related directions exert much weaker bidirectional control in latent CoT than in explicit CoT. These findings identify the transition interface as a central target for evaluating and designing future latent-steering methods.
Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2609.21662 [cs.CL]
  (or arXiv:2609.21662v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.21662
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Gaoxiang Huang [view email]
[v1] Fri, 18 Sep 2026 11:58:36 UTC (143 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

Current browse context:

cs.CL
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language