Beyond Relevance-Centric Retrieval: Rubric-Oriented Document Set Selection and Ranking
Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Computation and Language
Title:Beyond Relevance-Centric Retrieval: Rubric-Oriented Document Set Selection and Ranking
Abstract:As large language models and AI agents become the primary consumers of search results, document set quality determines the upper bound of downstream generation. Yet existing evaluation systems remain confined to scoring documents independently and aggregating via nDCG, ignoring inter-document interactions (redundancy, conflict, complementarity) and unable to answer what makes one document set better than another. To address these issues, we propose a complete evaluate-diagnose-optimize framework. We design SetwiseEvalKit, a three-level, nine-dimension document set evaluation benchmark covering both short-form and long-form scenarios, comprising approximately 28K high-quality evaluation rubrics. We systematically evaluate 12 rerankers: even the best method achieves no more than 45% coverage, cross-document coordination dimensions are universally weak, and no single method maintains top performance across both settings. Building on this, we propose Rubric4Setwise, a training-free method that converts rubric-based evaluation criteria into document set selection signals, achieving the best downstream generation performance with fewer documents and search rounds. It is the only method that maintains state-of-the-art results across both scenarios, validating the effectiveness of closing the loop from evaluation to optimization.
| Comments: | Project Page: this https URL |
| Subjects: | Computation and Language (cs.CL) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2607.19747 [cs.CL] |
| (or arXiv:2607.19747v1 [cs.CL] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.19747
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
|
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language
-
Procedural Fairness Failures in RLHF from Preference Averaging
Aug 12
-
Power law graph attention: exact generalization of scaled dot-product attention, empirical collapse at inference
Aug 12
-
Share First, Route What Remains: A Unified Framework for Token-Adaptive MoE Computation
Aug 12
-
Detecting an Effect Is Not Learning to Act on It: A Reward-SNR Floor for LLM Acquisition Agents
Aug 12
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.