The Gradient Does Not See Rank: Rank-Indifference in Matrix-CODI on ProsQA
Mirrored from arXiv — Machine Learning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Machine Learning
arXiv:2609.03090 (cs)
[Submitted on 2 Sep 2026]
Title:The Gradient Does Not See Rank: Rank-Indifference in Matrix-CODI on ProsQA
Authors:Samuel Larson (Pebble ML)
View a PDF of the paper titled The Gradient Does Not See Rank: Rank-Indifference in Matrix-CODI on ProsQA, by Samuel Larson (Pebble ML)
View PDF
Abstract:Continuous chain-of-thought models compress reasoning into latent tokens. Matrix-valued variants, which route each latent token through a d x d matrix bottleneck, introduce rank as a single-sample structural observable on the latent matrix Z. If matrix latents carry parallel reasoning paths via superposition, rank should track them, and truncating Z to low rank should hurt accuracy on tasks whose solutions plausibly require multiple components. Across four training regimes of a matrix-CODI model (three on ProsQA, one on GSM8K-Aug below the learning threshold), the rank-k projection ablation curve is flat to within 0.6 percentage points. A three-seed replication yields 81.0 +/- 2.0 percentage points accuracy while the final effective rank of Z spans {4, 12, 13}; the loss does not reward any particular rank. To test whether rank-blindness arises from the flatten-then-project readout alone, we trained four readouts: a bilinear reparametrization, a bilinear-plus-GELU readout nonlinear in Z, an SVD-augmented readout feeding singular values through an MLP, and a quadratic readout in Z Z^T. All four rank-k curves remain flat (Spearman p-values 0.63, 0.14, 0.82, 0.46). The flat curves persist for readouts nonlinear in Z. A linear probe on Z underperforms a raw pretrained hidden state at target prediction (AUC 0.673 vs. 0.846). A negative control on vanilla GPT-2 SFT (no matrix bottleneck, no Z, three seeds, n=500) reproduces a flat rank-k curve under the same intervention paradigm with pooled-mean range 0.20pp, and a random-h sensitivity floor lands at the same accuracy: the rank-k ablation alone conflates rank-blindness with position-irrelevance.
| Comments: | Accepted at the ICML 2026 Mechanistic Interpretability Workshop, this https URL. 9 pages. Corrects a data-entry error in the workshop version: the seed-1337 accuracy in the three-seed replication was reported as 80.47% (a control run); the archived value is 78.91%, so the three-seed mean is 81.0 +/- 2.0pp (was 81.5 +/- 1.2pp). All other results are unchanged |
| Subjects: | Machine Learning (cs.LG) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2609.03090 [cs.LG] |
| (or arXiv:2609.03090v1 [cs.LG] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.03090
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
|
Full-text links:
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- TeX Source
View a PDF of the paper titled The Gradient Does Not See Rank: Rank-Indifference in Matrix-CODI on ProsQA, by Samuel Larson (Pebble ML)
References & Citations
Loading...
Bibliographic Tools
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Recommenders and Search Tools
Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv recommender toggle
IArxiv Recommender
(What is IArxiv?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.