arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language · · 3 min read

Beyond Initialization Loss: A Systematic Study of Token Embedding Initialization Strategies for LLM Vocabulary Extension

Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Computation and Language

arXiv:2608.03494 (cs)
[Submitted on 4 Aug 2026]

Title:Beyond Initialization Loss: A Systematic Study of Token Embedding Initialization Strategies for LLM Vocabulary Extension

View a PDF of the paper titled Beyond Initialization Loss: A Systematic Study of Token Embedding Initialization Strategies for LLM Vocabulary Extension, by Raviraj Joshi and 3 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Vocabulary extension is an efficient way to adapt pretrained large language models (LLMs) to new languages, but the initialization of newly added token embeddings can strongly affect continued pre-training (CPT) efficiency. We present a systematic study of more than 20 initialization strategies for Hindi vocabulary extension in Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B. Our comparison spans vocabulary-averaging baselines; external and learned initialization methods, including FOCUS, top-k semantic retrieval, and residual MLP mappings; subword composition; norm calibration; and input-output asymmetry. We find that subword composition methods outperform both vocabulary averaging and external/learned initialization approaches. Within subword composition, asymmetric variants achieve the lowest observed early validation loss and reveal distinct preferences for input and output embedding initialization. The best observed configuration initializes the input embedding matrix with uniform subword averaging and Hindi-specific norm calibration, and the output language modeling head with character-length-weighted subword averaging. Relative to the standard Mean-all baseline, this full initialization pipeline reaches comparable validation loss with over a 6x reduction in CPT steps and exceeds the baseline's 3,500-step MILU-Hindi accuracy after only 500 steps. Finally, we show that initialization loss and initialization bits-per-byte (Init BPB) are unreliable predictors of downstream convergence, whereas lightweight CPT, as few as 50 steps, provides a cost-effective and reliable signal for selecting the best initialization strategy.
Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
Cite as: arXiv:2608.03494 [cs.CL]
  (or arXiv:2608.03494v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.03494
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Raviraj Joshi [view email]
[v1] Tue, 4 Aug 2026 11:32:10 UTC (766 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Beyond Initialization Loss: A Systematic Study of Token Embedding Initialization Strategies for LLM Vocabulary Extension, by Raviraj Joshi and 3 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source

Current browse context:

cs.CL
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language