arXiv — Machine Learning · · 4 min read

Exact Action Values Are Not Enough: Rollout-Verified Reinforcement Fine-Tuning of a Reasoning Model for Multi-Zone VAV Control

Mirrored from arXiv — Machine Learning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Machine Learning

arXiv:2607.27914 (cs)
[Submitted on 30 Jul 2026]

Title:Exact Action Values Are Not Enough: Rollout-Verified Reinforcement Fine-Tuning of a Reasoning Model for Multi-Zone VAV Control

View a PDF of the paper titled Exact Action Values Are Not Enough: Rollout-Verified Reinforcement Fine-Tuning of a Reasoning Model for Multi-Zone VAV Control, by Takumi Shioda and 2 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Multi-zone variable-air-volume control must balance thermal comfort, indoor air quality, and electricity use across several continuous actuators. Model predictive control and reinforcement learning are widely studied, but deployment typically requires building-specific modeling or training, limiting scalability. We first test whether a frontier reasoning model (an LLM trained to use additional inference-time computation) can achieve competitive VAV control from text without building-specific training. With that capability established, we then test whether TD3-guided reinforcement fine-tuning (RFT) can transfer control knowledge into a locally deployable open-weight model. Five controllers are evaluated over three summer days in a physics-based four-zone emulator. Relative to a Guideline 36-based baseline, TD3 reduced HVAC electricity by 4.5% while improving temperature and CO$_2$ compliance. Without building-specific training, GPT-5 achieved the largest reduction (6.2%) but reduced the ventilation margin. For RFT, deterministic rollouts restore a saved state, apply one candidate, and follow TD3 to score each action. Auditing a learned critic against these rollouts exposed a failure hidden by its near-perfect across-time correlation ($r=0.9998$): within-state ranking was unreliable; the critic selected the rollout-best candidate in only 5 of 10 states. Even with the rollout verifier, 200 RFT steps produced no sustained improvement in sampled-action return; the open-weight controller used more electricity than the baseline before and after training, and its five-minute predictions remained worse than persistence. GPT-5 predicted transitions far better. Exact rollout scores rank sampled actions but reveal neither next-state effects nor an improvement direction. The unchanged transition errors motivate transition-focused supervised fine-tuning before value-based RFT.
Comments: 34 pages, 14 figures
Subjects: Machine Learning (cs.LG); Systems and Control (eess.SY)
Cite as: arXiv:2607.27914 [cs.LG]
  (or arXiv:2607.27914v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.27914
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Takumi Shioda [view email]
[v1] Thu, 30 Jul 2026 09:28:37 UTC (1,095 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Exact Action Values Are Not Enough: Rollout-Verified Reinforcement Fine-Tuning of a Reasoning Model for Multi-Zone VAV Control, by Takumi Shioda and 2 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source

Current browse context:

cs.LG
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv recommender toggle
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — Machine Learning