arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language · · 3 min read

Improving Health Literacy through Lay Summarization of Radiological Reports: An Evaluation of BioNER and Retrieval-Augmented Generation

Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Computation and Language

arXiv:2609.02396 (cs)
[Submitted on 2 Sep 2026]

Title:Improving Health Literacy through Lay Summarization of Radiological Reports: An Evaluation of BioNER and Retrieval-Augmented Generation

View a PDF of the paper titled Improving Health Literacy through Lay Summarization of Radiological Reports: An Evaluation of BioNER and Retrieval-Augmented Generation, by Egecan \c{C}elik Evgin and 2 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Radiology reports are written primarily for clinicians, and their specialized terminology often makes them difficult for patients to interpret. As a result, many patients turn to publicly available Large Language Models (LLMs) to help explain their reports, despite well-documented risks of factual inaccuracies and hallucinations. Automated lay-summary generation has emerged as a promising alternative, yet the effectiveness of retrieval-enhanced and clinically informed approaches for radiology-specific communication remains underexplored. This study investigates the extent to which Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) and Named Entity Recognition (NER) improve the quality, factual consistency, and readability of automatically generated lay summaries compared with standard LLM-based generation. We develop a framework combining NER-based extraction of clinically relevant findings with a RAG mechanism for contextual grounding, evaluated across few-shot and fine-tuned variants of two models (Qwen, BioBART). Results show that NER consistently improves readability and overall quality, while RAG alone offers no benefit and can introduce hallucinations from irrelevant retrieved terms. Combining RAG with NER degrades performance in few-shot settings but improves readability when fine-tuned. Fine-tuned BioBART with NER achieves the best overall performance, highlighting entity-aware extraction as the primary driver of improved patient-friendly summaries.
Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL)
Cite as: arXiv:2609.02396 [cs.CL]
  (or arXiv:2609.02396v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.02396
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Egecan Çelik Evgin [view email]
[v1] Wed, 2 Sep 2026 10:06:13 UTC (35 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Improving Health Literacy through Lay Summarization of Radiological Reports: An Evaluation of BioNER and Retrieval-Augmented Generation, by Egecan \c{C}elik Evgin and 2 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source

Current browse context:

cs.CL
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language