arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language · · 3 min read

Subject-level Inference for Realistic Text Anonymization Evaluation

Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Computation and Language

arXiv:2604.21211 (cs)
[Submitted on 23 Apr 2026 (v1), last revised 25 Jun 2026 (this version, v2)]

Title:Subject-level Inference for Realistic Text Anonymization Evaluation

View a PDF of the paper titled Subject-level Inference for Realistic Text Anonymization Evaluation, by Myeong Seok Oh and 8 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Current text anonymization evaluation relies on span-based metrics that fail to capture what an adversary could actually infer, and assumes a single data subject, ignoring multi-subject scenarios. To address these limitations, we present SPIA (Subject-level PII Inference Assessment), the first benchmark that shifts the unit of evaluation from text spans to individuals, comprising 675 documents across legal and online domains with novel subject-level protection metrics. Extensive experiments show that even when over 90% of PII spans are masked, subject-level inference protection drops as low as 33%, leaving the majority of personal information recoverable through contextual inference. Furthermore, target-subject-focused anonymization leaves non-target subjects substantially more exposed than the target subject. We show that subject-level inference-based evaluation is essential for ensuring safe text anonymization in real-world settings.
Comments: Accepted at ACL 2026
Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL)
Cite as: arXiv:2604.21211 [cs.CL]
  (or arXiv:2604.21211v2 [cs.CL] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.21211
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Myeong Seok Oh [view email]
[v1] Thu, 23 Apr 2026 02:02:32 UTC (865 KB)
[v2] Thu, 25 Jun 2026 23:30:44 UTC (984 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

Current browse context:

cs.CL
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language