How Far Do Auto-Interpretation Labels Generalize: A Controlled Study Across Languages, Scripts, and Rewordings
Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Computation and Language
Title:How Far Do Auto-Interpretation Labels Generalize: A Controlled Study Across Languages, Scripts, and Rewordings
Abstract:Sparse autoencoder (SAE) features are increasingly used to interpret language models, with auto-generated natural-language labels serving as the primary interface for understanding what each feature represents. We ask whether these labels generalize: does a feature labeled for a concept actually track that concept across languages and scripts? Using Serbian digraphia as a controlled testbed -- the same language written in both Latin and Cyrillic via deterministic transliteration -- we first find that SAE feature sets activated by the same content in different languages, scripts, and wordings share substantial overlap (peak Jaccard similarity 0.57 vs.\ 0.13 random baseline), suggesting genuine cross-lingual semantic features. We then test whether auto-interpretation labels keep pace. They often do not: features whose labels describe semantic content miss the same meaning in Serbian up to $4\times$ more often than within English, and miss Serbian Cyrillic more than Serbian Latin -- two scripts that are deterministic transliterations of each other -- suggesting the failures track how well each form is represented in training. The gap grows with network depth, yet the labels give no indication that they fail. These results suggest that auto-interpretation labels may reflect a feature's behavior on well-represented inputs rather than the concept itself.
| Subjects: | Computation and Language (cs.CL) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2606.00356 [cs.CL] |
| (or arXiv:2606.00356v1 [cs.CL] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.00356
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
|
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
References & Citations
Bookmark
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language
-
DraDDP: A Multimodal Multi-Party Dialogue Discourse Parsing Dataset
Jun 2
-
Toward Robust In-Context Learning: Leveraging Out-of-distribution Proxies for Target Inaccessible Demonstration Retrieval
Jun 2
-
AEyeDE: An Attention-Based Attribution Framework for AI-Generated Text Detection
Jun 2
-
CSRP: Chain-of-Thought Reasoning for Chinese Text Correction via Reinforcement Learning with Efficiency-Aware Rewards
Jun 2
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.