Hugging Face Daily Papers · · 3 min read

Diagnosing Harmful Continuation in Answer-Correct Long-CoT Training Traces

Mirrored from Hugging Face Daily Papers for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

This paper studies a hidden data-quality problem in long-CoT SFT: even when a reasoning trace reaches the correct answer, extra reasoning after the conclusion can harm training. The authors define this as post-conclusion continuation, build diagnostics to detect harmful continuations, and show that filtering or truncating such traces can improve reasoning fine-tuning outcomes.</p>\n","updatedAt":"2026-06-03T05:04:25.922Z","author":{"_id":"63369da91ba5d5ece24118a4","avatarUrl":"/avatars/67889e1ecadb04100a77bc8b5284c6fd.svg","fullname":"wuyuhao","name":"mozhu","type":"user","isPro":false,"isHf":false,"isHfAdmin":false,"isMod":false,"followerCount":5,"isUserFollowing":false}},"numEdits":0,"identifiedLanguage":{"language":"en","probability":0.8753976225852966},"editors":["mozhu"],"editorAvatarUrls":["/avatars/67889e1ecadb04100a77bc8b5284c6fd.svg"],"reactions":[],"isReport":false}}],"primaryEmailConfirmed":false,"paper":{"id":"2605.29288","authors":[{"_id":"6a1fa59ee292c1c78ecb136d","name":"Chen He","hidden":false},{"_id":"6a1fa59ee292c1c78ecb136e","name":"Yuhao Wu","hidden":false},{"_id":"6a1fa59ee292c1c78ecb136f","name":"Lei Wang","hidden":false},{"_id":"6a1fa59ee292c1c78ecb1370","name":"Wenxuan Zhang","hidden":false},{"_id":"6a1fa59ee292c1c78ecb1371","name":"Fumin Shen","hidden":false}],"publishedAt":"2026-05-28T00:00:00.000Z","submittedOnDailyAt":"2026-06-03T00:00:00.000Z","title":"Diagnosing Harmful Continuation in Answer-Correct Long-CoT Training Traces","submittedOnDailyBy":{"_id":"63369da91ba5d5ece24118a4","avatarUrl":"/avatars/67889e1ecadb04100a77bc8b5284c6fd.svg","isPro":false,"fullname":"wuyuhao","user":"mozhu","type":"user","name":"mozhu"},"summary":"Long chain-of-thought (CoT) traces are widely used as supervision for reasoning-oriented LLM SFT, yet answer-correct traces can still lead to markedly different fine-tuning outcomes. We study post-conclusion continuation in answer-correct long-CoT data: a continuation where the answer appears sufficiently supported, but the trace continues with additional reasoning that remains in the supervised target. To test its training effect, we use a delete-only editor to construct answer-preserving suffix removal and compare CoT-based SFT on the original and processed traces. We observe improved SFT outcomes after removing the editor-identified post-conclusion continuation, suggesting that this continuation is harmful to training in our setting. We therefore refer to this empirically supported phenomenon as harmful continuation. Beyond this intervention, we further characterize the removed post-conclusion continuation through uncertainty and hidden-state progress. We observe persistent local uncertainty together with weakened terminal-directional progress, forming an uncertainty--geometry mismatch. Finally, we instantiate Harmful Continuation Cut (HCC), a lightweight boundary proxy that approximates the editor-identified post-conclusion continuation boundary.","upvotes":6,"discussionId":"6a1fa59ee292c1c78ecb1372","ai_summary":"Answer-correct long chain-of-thought traces can lead to different fine-tuning outcomes, with post-conclusion continuations identified as harmful to training, characterized by uncertainty-geometry mismatches and addressed through a lightweight boundary proxy method.","ai_keywords":["chain-of-thought","large language models","supervised fine-tuning","answer-correct traces","post-conclusion continuation","delete-only editor","uncertainty","hidden-state progress","uncertainty-geometry mismatch","Harmful Continuation Cut"],"ai_summary_model":"Qwen/Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct"},"canReadDatabase":false,"canManagePapers":false,"canSubmit":false,"hasHfLevelAccess":false,"upvoted":false,"upvoters":[{"_id":"63369da91ba5d5ece24118a4","avatarUrl":"/avatars/67889e1ecadb04100a77bc8b5284c6fd.svg","isPro":false,"fullname":"wuyuhao","user":"mozhu","type":"user"},{"_id":"66a0d8cbc77099d013e9da92","avatarUrl":"/avatars/59f9d9529a246510c9f8e13c0dd6605c.svg","isPro":false,"fullname":"mantou","user":"mantou-cloud","type":"user"},{"_id":"684526dd103a93da4dc7d850","avatarUrl":"/avatars/5e756e1f5da6b68afb6c9ed165d3bc28.svg","isPro":false,"fullname":"Shenshen Li","user":"lss727","type":"user"},{"_id":"68d1117c32fe33a071b2d55b","avatarUrl":"https://cdn-avatars.huggingface.co/v1/production/uploads/no-auth/UAvJVZtMcAUeoiauLvvbk.png","isPro":false,"fullname":"Chen He","user":"Dhragatis","type":"user"},{"_id":"646def60df618b303b419323","avatarUrl":"https://cdn-avatars.huggingface.co/v1/production/uploads/646def60df618b303b419323/JLJGYen4-5M8ivsLsSk0w.jpeg","isPro":false,"fullname":"Lei Wang","user":"demolei","type":"user"},{"_id":"64808f625409aa3e3bbbb7a4","avatarUrl":"/avatars/6647d2faca41205592211c5b4d69ce67.svg","isPro":false,"fullname":"J","user":"CFM-X","type":"user"}],"acceptLanguages":["en"],"dailyPaperRank":0,"markdownContentUrl":"https://huggingface.co/buckets/huggingchat/papers-content/resolve/2605/2605.29288.md"}">
Papers
arxiv:2605.29288

Diagnosing Harmful Continuation in Answer-Correct Long-CoT Training Traces

Published on May 28
· Submitted by
wuyuhao
on Jun 3
Authors:
,
,
,
,

Abstract

Answer-correct long chain-of-thought traces can lead to different fine-tuning outcomes, with post-conclusion continuations identified as harmful to training, characterized by uncertainty-geometry mismatches and addressed through a lightweight boundary proxy method.

Long chain-of-thought (CoT) traces are widely used as supervision for reasoning-oriented LLM SFT, yet answer-correct traces can still lead to markedly different fine-tuning outcomes. We study post-conclusion continuation in answer-correct long-CoT data: a continuation where the answer appears sufficiently supported, but the trace continues with additional reasoning that remains in the supervised target. To test its training effect, we use a delete-only editor to construct answer-preserving suffix removal and compare CoT-based SFT on the original and processed traces. We observe improved SFT outcomes after removing the editor-identified post-conclusion continuation, suggesting that this continuation is harmful to training in our setting. We therefore refer to this empirically supported phenomenon as harmful continuation. Beyond this intervention, we further characterize the removed post-conclusion continuation through uncertainty and hidden-state progress. We observe persistent local uncertainty together with weakened terminal-directional progress, forming an uncertainty--geometry mismatch. Finally, we instantiate Harmful Continuation Cut (HCC), a lightweight boundary proxy that approximates the editor-identified post-conclusion continuation boundary.

Community

Paper submitter about 8 hours ago

This paper studies a hidden data-quality problem in long-CoT SFT: even when a reasoning trace reaches the correct answer, extra reasoning after the conclusion can harm training. The authors define this as post-conclusion continuation, build diagnostics to detect harmful continuations, and show that filtering or truncating such traces can improve reasoning fine-tuning outcomes.

Upload images, audio, and videos by dragging in the text input, pasting, or clicking here.
Tap or paste here to upload images

· Sign up or log in to comment

Get this paper in your agent:

hf papers read 2605.29288
Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash

Models citing this paper 0

No model linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2605.29288 in a model README.md to link it from this page.

Datasets citing this paper 0

No dataset linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2605.29288 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.

Spaces citing this paper 0

No Space linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2605.29288 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.

Collections including this paper 0

No Collection including this paper

Add this paper to a collection to link it from this page.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from Hugging Face Daily Papers