PEFT of SLM for Telecommunications Customer Support: A Comparative Study of LoRA Configurations with Energy Consumption Analysis
Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Computation and Language
arXiv:2606.05176 (cs)
[Submitted on 17 Apr 2026]
Title:PEFT of SLM for Telecommunications Customer Support: A Comparative Study of LoRA Configurations with Energy Consumption Analysis
View a PDF of the paper titled PEFT of SLM for Telecommunications Customer Support: A Comparative Study of LoRA Configurations with Energy Consumption Analysis, by Lucas Tamic and 2 other authors
View PDF
HTML (experimental)
Abstract:While large language models (LLMs) show strong performance in natural language understanding and generation, their evaluation and adaptation to domain-specific constraints in telecommunications customer support remain limited. In addition, data sovereignty, regulatory constraints, and the handling of sensitive customer and network information complicate the use of externally hosted foundation models in this domain.
We present a systematic study of parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) using Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) applied to Qwen2.5-3B to build a domain-specific conversational assistant. We introduce a combinatorial synthetic data generation approach based on a glossary of 52 industry-specific terms, producing approximately 30,000 training examples across 1,560 distinct problem scenarios via a generative pipeline powered by Gemini 2.0 Flash.
We evaluate 16 LoRA configurations by varying hyperparameters and target modules. Our evaluation extends beyond standard metrics by incorporating energy consumption analysis and qualitative assessment using an LLM-as-a-judge framework with GPT-5.2 and Claude 4.5 Sonnet.
Results show a clear divergence between quantitative and qualitative performance: models achieving the lowest validation loss do not necessarily obtain the best human-aligned rankings. The best validation loss (0.5024) ranks only 6th-7th in qualitative evaluation, while the worst loss (0.6807) ranks first according to both judges.
This work contributes (1) a combinatorial method for synthetic dataset construction, (2) insights into the impact of target module selection for LoRA injection, (3) evidence that validation loss alone is insufficient for selecting fine-tuning configurations in conversational AI, and (4) an energy-performance trade-off analysis for sustainable LLM deployment.
| Subjects: | Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2606.05176 [cs.CL] |
| (or arXiv:2606.05176v1 [cs.CL] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.05176
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
|
Full-text links:
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
View a PDF of the paper titled PEFT of SLM for Telecommunications Customer Support: A Comparative Study of LoRA Configurations with Energy Consumption Analysis, by Lucas Tamic and 2 other authors
References & Citations
Loading...
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Recommenders and Search Tools
Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language
-
Epidemiology of Model Collapse: Modeling Synthetic Data Contamination via Bilayer SIR Dynamics
Jun 5
-
Predict and Reconstruct: Joint Objectives for Self-Supervised Language Representation Learning
Jun 5
-
Improving Heart-Focused Medical Question Answering in LLMs via Variance-Aware Rubric Rewards with GRPO
Jun 5
-
Generic Triple-Latent Compression with Gated Associative Retrieval
Jun 5
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.