AAAI 2027 Review: No code submission? [D]
Mirrored from r/MachineLearning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
I am now reviewing a bunch of papers for AAAI 2027 and it has surprised me the low amount of submissions with no code implementation. I don’t know if it has been only in my batch or it is common, but I was expecting very detailed appendices + code submission since AAAI is very explicit with the topic of reproducibility. I was planning to take this into consideration when assigning my initial scores, but I would like to hear your opinions. I have always submitted my code: it gives a very good impression and after reviewing process finishes we just publish it on ArXiv, so no one “tries to stole the idea” (although I think that this is very very unlikely). So I cannot find any excuse for those submissions that do not have code implementation, specially in today’s times where AI assistants can just write an empirical paper with artificial results within a couple of hours
[link] [comments]
More from r/MachineLearning
-
TMLR Relevance and Prestige [D]
Aug 13
-
Reproducible canvas-aligned low-level patterns in somerandomllm-generated images and their possible relation to iterative editing artifacts [D]
Aug 13
-
worldproof: diagnosing where world-model predictions break and a measurement of when pixel metrics stop being able to rank models at all [P]
Aug 13
-
UrgenT Help Detecting Performance Regressions Using Machine Learning and Hardware Counters [P]
Aug 13
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.