arXiv — Machine Learning · · 3 min read

ContinuityBench: A Benchmark and Systems Study of Stateful Failover in Multi-Provider LLM Routing

Mirrored from arXiv — Machine Learning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Machine Learning

arXiv:2607.15899 (cs)
[Submitted on 17 Jul 2026]

Title:ContinuityBench: A Benchmark and Systems Study of Stateful Failover in Multi-Provider LLM Routing

View a PDF of the paper titled ContinuityBench: A Benchmark and Systems Study of Stateful Failover in Multi-Provider LLM Routing, by Vishal Pandey and 1 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:In production large language model (LLM) deployments, high API availability guarantees do not equate to conversational continuity. When a primary provider experiences an outage or strict rate-limiting, naive stateless failover mechanisms successfully maintain uptime but silently discard conversation history, severely disrupting the user experience. To rigorously quantify and resolve this failure mode, we introduce two novel metrics: Continuity Preservation Rate (CPR) and Continuity Latency Overhead (CLO). We propose a stateful, multi-provider proxy architecture utilizing a History-Forwarding strategy to seamlessly reconstruct conversational state across heterogeneous LLM endpoints during failover events. Furthermore, we release continuity-bench, this https URL, an open evaluation harness designed to stress-test context preservation under high-concurrency provider failure conditions. Our empirical evaluation ($N=750$ failover events) demonstrates that our stateful proxy achieves a 99.20\% CPR [95\% CI: 98.27\%, 99.63\%], cleanly transferring deep conversational context to fallback providers, compared to a near-0\% preservation rate for standard stateless architectures. Finally, we characterize failover latency distributions, identifying the critical necessity of asynchronous exponential backoff with jitter to prevent cascading retry storms against strict-limit fallback APIs. Our results provide a principled foundation for building robust, state-preserving multi-model inference systems.
Comments: 16 pages, 2 figures
Subjects: Machine Learning (cs.LG)
Cite as: arXiv:2607.15899 [cs.LG]
  (or arXiv:2607.15899v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.15899
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Vishal Pandey [view email]
[v1] Fri, 17 Jul 2026 12:12:38 UTC (1,944 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled ContinuityBench: A Benchmark and Systems Study of Stateful Failover in Multi-Provider LLM Routing, by Vishal Pandey and 1 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source

Current browse context:

cs.LG
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv recommender toggle
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — Machine Learning