Gromov-Monge Flow Matching for Equivariant Graph Generation
Mirrored from arXiv — Machine Learning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Machine Learning
arXiv:2608.26961 (cs)
[Submitted on 27 Aug 2026]
Title:Gromov-Monge Flow Matching for Equivariant Graph Generation
View a PDF of the paper titled Gromov-Monge Flow Matching for Equivariant Graph Generation, by Moritz Piening and Christian Wald
View PDF
HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Graphs are invariant under node permutations, motivating the use of permutation-equivariant architectures in generative models. In flow matching, however, symmetry may also enter the source--target coupling: once graph pairs are compared up to node relabeling, the natural Wasserstein geometry is that of the graph quotient space. The Euclidean quotient metric of this space coincides with the Gromov--Monge distance, obtained by optimally relabeling the nodes. We develop this perspective theoretically, showing that quotient couplings can be lifted to aligned representatives without additional cost and that symmetrization yields equivariant flow-matching minimizers, including for categorical endpoint prediction. In practice, exact Gromov--Monge alignment is intractable, so we construct minibatch couplings using efficient Gromov--Wasserstein-type relaxations and lower bounds for the inner node alignment, optionally combined with an outer assignment between graphs. The resulting procedure changes only the training coupling and is compatible with standard permutation-equivariant architectures. Across continuous graph and categorical molecular generation, these structure-aware couplings substantially improve sample quality at small integration budgets, while our scaled-up molecular models remain competitive under conventional many-step sampling.
| Comments: | Gromov-Wasserstein, Optimal Transport, Flow Matching, Graph Generation, Equivariant Networks |
| Subjects: | Machine Learning (cs.LG); Optimization and Control (math.OC); Machine Learning (stat.ML) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2608.26961 [cs.LG] |
| (or arXiv:2608.26961v1 [cs.LG] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.26961
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
|
Full-text links:
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
View a PDF of the paper titled Gromov-Monge Flow Matching for Equivariant Graph Generation, by Moritz Piening and Christian Wald
Current browse context:
cs.LG
References & Citations
Loading...
Bibliographic Tools
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Recommenders and Search Tools
Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv recommender toggle
IArxiv Recommender
(What is IArxiv?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.