arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language · · 3 min read

Cultural Divergence Preservation: Diagnosing Flattening and Caricature in LLM-Simulated Survey Populations

Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Computation and Language

arXiv:2609.29928 (cs)
[Submitted on 24 Sep 2026]

Title:Cultural Divergence Preservation: Diagnosing Flattening and Caricature in LLM-Simulated Survey Populations

View a PDF of the paper titled Cultural Divergence Preservation: Diagnosing Flattening and Caricature in LLM-Simulated Survey Populations, by Yeeun Chae and 3 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used as synthetic survey respondents to estimate population response distributions. In cross-cultural survey simulation, evaluations should assess not only distributional fidelity within countries but also whether differences across countries are preserved. However, existing distance-based metrics such as Jensen--Shannon divergence (JSD) do not directly capture such cross-country differences. To address this limitation, we introduce Cultural Divergence Preservation (CDP), a reference-light diagnostic based on a one-time human calibration. CDP identifies reduced cross-country divergence as cultural flattening and increased divergence as cultural caricature. To evaluate CDP, we conduct experiments across four LLM backbones, three persona-based prompting methods, and two survey domains, the World Values Survey (WVS) and the Big Five Personality Test. The results reveal a systematic discrepancy between conventional fidelity metrics and CDP. Controlled experiments show that CDP changes monotonically as cross-country divergence is attenuated or amplified, while the corresponding changes in JSD remain relatively small. In our audit of real LLM generations, DeepPersona-Inspired prompting is frequently favored by conventional fidelity metrics but exhibits the strongest flattening in every model--domain block. CDP thus complements fidelity metrics by directly quantifying the attenuation or amplification of cross-country divergence.
Comments: Accepted to the EMNLP 2026 Workshop on Pluralistic AI & NLP (PANDORA)
Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2609.29928 [cs.CL]
  (or arXiv:2609.29928v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.29928
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Yeeun Chae [view email]
[v1] Thu, 24 Sep 2026 14:59:06 UTC (4,175 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Cultural Divergence Preservation: Diagnosing Flattening and Caricature in LLM-Simulated Survey Populations, by Yeeun Chae and 3 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source

Current browse context:

cs.CL
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language