arXiv — Machine Learning · · 3 min read

Near-Optimal Regret in Adversarial Kernel Bandits

Mirrored from arXiv — Machine Learning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Machine Learning

arXiv:2605.26585 (cs)
[Submitted on 26 May 2026]

Title:Near-Optimal Regret in Adversarial Kernel Bandits

View a PDF of the paper titled Near-Optimal Regret in Adversarial Kernel Bandits, by Yu-Jie Zhang and Hao Qiu and Jonathan Scarlett and Kevin Jamieson
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:We study the adversarial kernel bandit problem, in which the loss at each round is induced by an arbitrary bounded element of a reproducing kernel Hilbert space (RKHS). We propose an exponential-weights algorithm built on a regularized importance-weighted loss estimator, together with an explicit correction term that cancels the bias introduced by the regularization. Our main result bounds the regret by $\widetilde{O}\big(\sqrt{T\, d_*(\lambda)\,\log|{X}|}\big)$, where $d_*(\lambda)$ is a widely-adopted notion of effective dimension that captures the complexity of the kernel. Up to logarithmic factors, this matches the known rate achieved in the related stochastic kernel bandit problem. A notable application is the Matérn$(\nu,d)$ kernel with smoothness parameter $\nu$ on $\mathbb{R}^d$, for which our bound specializes to $\widetilde{O}\big(T^{(\nu+d)/(2\nu+d)}\big)$, improving over the best-known prior rate of Chatterji et al. [2019] while simultaneously removing the rank-one adversary assumption required by their analysis. Moreover, this rate is the same as the known optimal rate for stochastic kernel bandits, and also matches a lower bound from concurrent work up to a $\log T$ factor.
Subjects: Machine Learning (cs.LG)
Cite as: arXiv:2605.26585 [cs.LG]
  (or arXiv:2605.26585v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.26585
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Yu-Jie Zhang [view email]
[v1] Tue, 26 May 2026 06:10:24 UTC (61 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

Current browse context:

cs.LG
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv recommender toggle
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — Machine Learning