arXiv — Machine Learning · · 4 min read

Prior-matched evaluation of operational Earth-observation classifiers: a three-number reporting method demonstrated on Sentinel-1 internal-wave detection

Mirrored from arXiv — Machine Learning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Machine Learning

arXiv:2607.07146 (cs)
[Submitted on 8 Jul 2026]

Title:Prior-matched evaluation of operational Earth-observation classifiers: a three-number reporting method demonstrated on Sentinel-1 internal-wave detection

View a PDF of the paper titled Prior-matched evaluation of operational Earth-observation classifiers: a three-number reporting method demonstrated on Sentinel-1 internal-wave detection, by Joao Pinelo and 3 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:The Internal Waves Service screens the Sentinel-1 Wave-mode archive for internal solitary waves, routing detections to experts whose adjudication time is the resource the effort exists to conserve. Because attention is the cost of error, precision leads. Its classifier was trained and reported at a one-to-one class balance, fixed before the operational rate could be known. That rate has since emerged at roughly one scene in twenty, and a balanced-test score badly overstates the precision a validator meets. A model that scores 0.794 balanced-test precision scores 0.192 in real operation: the gap is a systematic artefact of reporting at the wrong prior, invisible to the metric most work quotes. We show the mismatch to be an evaluation problem in the costume of a training one at a fixed recall, prior correction and calibration cannot move precision, and answer it with a prior-matched reporting method based on three figures: balanced-test, operational-prior, and real post-deployment, whose contrast is the honest measure. A precision-first, leakage-controlled development cycle then improves the classifier lever by lever, each promoted only against a pre-registered margin; added capacity not clearing it, calibration inert, feature aggregation the one real lift, so the honest negatives are as much a result as the gain. Holding recall at a floor of 0.80 and certifying against a sealed, single-read lockbox, the promoted model reports 0.927 precision at the operational prior; an out-of-time check confirms discrimination transfers to unseen periods while a fixed operating point does not. Prior-matched reporting, begin balanced, then move to the prior as the stream reveals it, transfers to any operational Earth-observation service bootstrapping a rare-event detector under a prior it has yet to discover.
Comments: 24 pages, 6 figures, 1 table
Subjects: Machine Learning (cs.LG); Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Image and Video Processing (eess.IV)
ACM classes: I.5.2; I.2.6; G.3
Cite as: arXiv:2607.07146 [cs.LG]
  (or arXiv:2607.07146v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.07146
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Joao Pinelo [view email]
[v1] Wed, 8 Jul 2026 08:38:40 UTC (2,211 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Prior-matched evaluation of operational Earth-observation classifiers: a three-number reporting method demonstrated on Sentinel-1 internal-wave detection, by Joao Pinelo and 3 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source

Current browse context:

cs.LG
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv recommender toggle
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — Machine Learning