arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language · · 3 min read

From Pixels to Pairs: A Comprehensive Benchmark of LLM-Based Key-Value Extraction in Noisy Document Settings

Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Computation and Language

arXiv:2609.17538 (cs)
[Submitted on 14 Jul 2026]

Title:From Pixels to Pairs: A Comprehensive Benchmark of LLM-Based Key-Value Extraction in Noisy Document Settings

View a PDF of the paper titled From Pixels to Pairs: A Comprehensive Benchmark of LLM-Based Key-Value Extraction in Noisy Document Settings, by Zahra Anvari and Vassilis Athitsos
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used for structured information extraction from documents, yet their behavior under realistic OCR noise remains poorly understood. We present a systematic benchmark of open-source instruction-tuned LLMs for key-value pair (KVP) extraction under both clean-text and noisy OCR conditions.
We evaluate representative decoder-only models (Gemma, Mistral, Qwen2.5, LLaMA 3, and DeepSeek) on the FUNSD, CORD, and SROIE benchmarks using both Gold-text annotations and OCR outputs from PaddleOCR, EasyOCR, and Tesseract. A unified evaluation protocol isolates the effects of input quality, model design, and prompting under consistent conditions.
The results show that modern LLMs act as strong semantic extractors when high-quality text is available, in some cases approaching supervised layout-aware systems. Under OCR noise, however, performance degrades substantially and performance gaps between models narrow as input corruption increases.
Across all datasets, extraction performance is governed by two factors: semantic reasoning over text and preservation of textual fidelity under OCR noise. While larger models improve results on clean text, these gains diminish under noisy inputs, where OCR quality becomes the dominant factor. We also identify recurring failure modes, including key-value misalignment, hallucination, and numeric corruption. Our findings highlight the gap between clean-text evaluation and real-world deployment, emphasizing the need to jointly improve OCR quality, structural reasoning, and LLM-based semantic modeling.
Comments: 25 pages, 20 tables, 5 figures
Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL); Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV)
Cite as: arXiv:2609.17538 [cs.CL]
  (or arXiv:2609.17538v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.17538
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Zahra Anvari [view email]
[v1] Tue, 14 Jul 2026 02:20:43 UTC (10,830 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled From Pixels to Pairs: A Comprehensive Benchmark of LLM-Based Key-Value Extraction in Noisy Document Settings, by Zahra Anvari and Vassilis Athitsos
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source

Current browse context:

cs.CL
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language