Neurips 2026: Modified date on reviews [D]
Mirrored from r/MachineLearning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Reviews modified dates are public, and some are recent. I’m a bit confused as to how to interpret this.
In other conferences, reviewers were required to provide a final justification, which would practically force them to modify their reviews during the AC discussion phase lest they get desk rejected.
Here in Neurips I notice that a lot of the high-score reviews do not have a modification past the author discussion phase. I talked with a friend who is an AC today and they told me that adding a final justification is apparently not mandatory and nobody in their batch did it, with people who had anything to add usually doing it in a private comment. They said that any review which has a recent modified date likely got its score updated.
Is that really the case? To any other ACs here: what part of the recently modified reviews in your batch were modified to increase the score?
[link] [comments]
More from r/MachineLearning
-
TMLR Relevance and Prestige [D]
Aug 13
-
Reproducible canvas-aligned low-level patterns in somerandomllm-generated images and their possible relation to iterative editing artifacts [D]
Aug 13
-
worldproof: diagnosing where world-model predictions break and a measurement of when pixel metrics stop being able to rank models at all [P]
Aug 13
-
UrgenT Help Detecting Performance Regressions Using Machine Learning and Hardware Counters [P]
Aug 13
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.