arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language · · 3 min read

CLASH: Counterfactual Auditing of Lexical and Prosodic Reliance in Spoken Sarcasm Detection

Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Sound

arXiv:2609.16582 (cs)
[Submitted on 15 Sep 2026]

Title:CLASH: Counterfactual Auditing of Lexical and Prosodic Reliance in Spoken Sarcasm Detection

View a PDF of the paper titled CLASH: Counterfactual Auditing of Lexical and Prosodic Reliance in Spoken Sarcasm Detection, by Qiyang Sun and 6 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Spoken sarcasm detectors may exploit lexical content, prosody, or their interaction, yet conventional evaluation cannot reveal which cues drive their predictions. We introduce CLASH (Controlled Lexical-Acoustic Separation Harness), a bilingual counterfactual diagnostic framework that evaluates each utterance under original, lexical-preserving, prosody-preserving, and approximately neutralised conditions. We evaluate handcrafted acoustic-feature systems, self-supervised learning (SSL) probes, and large audio language models (LALMs) on CMMA and MUStARD. For target-only Qwen3-Omni, lexical-preserving speech retains a 0.135--0.148 AUROC advantage over prosody-preserving speech after duration balancing, with cluster-bootstrap intervals above zero; alternative lexical resynthesis preserves this advantage. Acoustic interventions shift scores without consistently improving discrimination or changing binary predictions under the evaluated conditions. Context and interaction estimates vary across corpora. These findings distinguish acoustic sensitivity from sarcasm discrimination while exposing duration, identity, and transformation effects.
Subjects: Sound (cs.SD); Computation and Language (cs.CL)
Cite as: arXiv:2609.16582 [cs.SD]
  (or arXiv:2609.16582v1 [cs.SD] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.16582
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Qiyang Sun [view email]
[v1] Tue, 15 Sep 2026 03:26:37 UTC (749 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled CLASH: Counterfactual Auditing of Lexical and Prosodic Reliance in Spoken Sarcasm Detection, by Qiyang Sun and 6 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source

Current browse context:

cs.SD
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language