arXiv — Machine Learning · · 3 min read

Block-Level Weight-Space Structure Persists Under Post-Training: An Empirical Study Across LLM Families

Mirrored from arXiv — Machine Learning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Machine Learning

arXiv:2609.26147 (cs)
[Submitted on 23 Aug 2026]

Title:Block-Level Weight-Space Structure Persists Under Post-Training: An Empirical Study Across LLM Families

Authors:Zhaohui Wang
View a PDF of the paper titled Block-Level Weight-Space Structure Persists Under Post-Training: An Empirical Study Across LLM Families, by Zhaohui Wang
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Modern LLMs are deployed as families of post-trained variants (base, instruct, chat, code) derived from a shared set of pre-trained weights. We present an empirical study of how post-training transforms weight-space geometry, covering eight configurations across four architecture families (Qwen2.5, Llama-3.1/3.2, Mistral, Gemma-2). We identify a granularity gap: post-training modifies every tensor (zero of 291-339 tensors remain byte-identical, so hash-based deduplication achieves 0% savings), yet preserves block-level structure (mean cosine similarity exceeds 0.99 and relative Frobenius distance stays below 0.13). Post-training therefore acts as a structured perturbation that shifts every parameter while leaving block-level geometry intact. The property is not universal: independently trained specializations (for example, Qwen2.5-Coder) attain cosine similarity around 0.64 with the general base, indicating a disconnected region of weight space. Perturbation magnitude varies systematically with model scale, architecture family, and post-training recipe. As a practical application, we build LinkerLLM, a lazy loader that aliases shareable blocks across co-resident variants, achieving 18-48% GPU memory savings and enabling up to five 7B-parameter variants on a single 24 GB consumer GPU. Five of eight configurations retain at least 94% of the unshared variant's quality on MMLU, ARC-Challenge, HellaSwag, and WinoGrande; the remaining three (Mistral-7B, Gemma-2-2B, Llama-3.2-1B) have one below-threshold benchmark each (87-91%), which we report transparently rather than gate the block-sharing decision on a single threshold.
Comments: 13 pages, 11 figures. Accepted at the ICML 2026 Workshop on Weight-Space Symmetries: from Foundations to Practical Applications. OpenReview: this https URL
Subjects: Machine Learning (cs.LG)
Cite as: arXiv:2609.26147 [cs.LG]
  (or arXiv:2609.26147v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.26147
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Zhaohui Wang [view email]
[v1] Sun, 23 Aug 2026 05:15:25 UTC (2,295 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Block-Level Weight-Space Structure Persists Under Post-Training: An Empirical Study Across LLM Families, by Zhaohui Wang
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source

Current browse context:

cs.LG
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv recommender toggle
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — Machine Learning