How Far Can Disaggregation Go? A Design-Space Exploration of Attention-FFN Disaggregation for Efficient MoE LLM Serving
Mirrored from arXiv — Machine Learning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Machine Learning
Title:How Far Can Disaggregation Go? A Design-Space Exploration of Attention-FFN Disaggregation for Efficient MoE LLM Serving
Abstract:Modern large language model (LLM) inference has progressively disaggregated to keep pace with growing model sizes and tight TTFT and TPOT service-level objectives: from chunked-prefill aggregation, to prefill-decode (P/D) disaggregation, and most recently to operator-level Attention-FFN Disaggregation (AFD). This trend is especially important for mixture-of-experts (MoE) models, where memory-bound attention, compute-intensive expert FFNs, and MoE dispatch/combine communication create distinct resource demands. AFD further exposes this heterogeneity by placing attention and MoE-FFN execution on separate GPU groups. Each level of disaggregation deepens the scheduling design space across workload characteristics, resource allocation, and interconnect topology, raising the central question: when does each level actually pay off? We systematically characterize this trade-off for MoE inference across realistic workloads spanning input/output sequence lengths, prefix-KV reuse, and per-user latency constraints. Using chunked-prefill and P/D disaggregation as baselines, we study the benefits and limits of AFD at scale through a framework that fuses on-device kernel measurements with high-fidelity network simulation. Under strict TTFT/TPOT SLOs, AFD sustains around 4k tokens/s of system throughput on DeepSeek-V3.2 across chat, coding, and agentic-coding workloads, where non-AFD deployments are infeasible. We distill concrete takeaways for jointly optimizing throughput and interactivity, including how to partition attention and FFN across GPUs as a function of workload and model architecture, providing design principles for current rack- and cluster-scale deployments as well as future disaggregated AI infrastructure.
| Subjects: | Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing (cs.DC) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2605.28302 [cs.LG] |
| (or arXiv:2605.28302v1 [cs.LG] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.28302
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
|
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
Current browse context:
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
More from arXiv — Machine Learning
-
Personalized Observation Normalization for Federated Reinforcement Learning in Simulation Environments with Heterogeneity
May 28
-
IGADA-IoT: IoT Sensor Energy Optimization in Wireless Sensor Networks Driven by Automatic Data Augmentation
May 28
-
A Simple State Space Model Excels at Multivariate Time Series Classification
May 28
-
$E^3$-Agent: An Executable and Evolving Agent for Resource Management of Edge Generative Inference
May 28
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.