Marcus on AI · · 1 min read

Breaking news: “they hadn’t figured out how OpenAI would pay for it”

Mirrored from Marcus on AI for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Breaking news from The Information:

@anissagardizy8 @theinformation, and credit her with the great line “OpenAI has made a habit of announcing landmark partnerships without ironing out the details”","username":"GaryMarcus","name":"Gary Marcus","profile_image_url":"https://pbs.substack.com/profile_images/2048405471900606464/kPeRHI2z_normal.jpg","date":"2026-05-07T21:24:24.000Z","photos":[],"quoted_tweet":{"full_text":"NEW: When OpenAI and Broadcom announced they would make 10 GW of custom AI chips together, they positioned it as a done deal.\n\nWhat they didn’t say was that they hadn’t figured out how OpenAI would pay for it. \n\nMonths later, the firms are negotiating an agreement for Broadcom to","username":"anissagardizy8","name":"Anissa Gardizy","profile_image_url":"https://pbs.substack.com/profile_images/1729447423024754688/YV60VKs-_normal.jpg"},"reply_count":0,"retweet_count":1,"like_count":1,"impression_count":108,"expanded_url":null,"video_url":null,"belowTheFold":false}" data-component-name="Twitter2ToDOM">

Remember this chart? Broadcome wasn’t even shown.

It’s already wildly out of date (e.g. the Anthropic-XAI deal from yesterday isn’t there and indeed Anthropic isn’t even shown; a bunch of Amazon and Alphabet deals are missing, etc. But you get the point.

Who knows how many of the connections in this diagram depend on financing that could fall through.

Or what might happen if it does.

Share

Bonus: egged on by me earlier today, someone on X asked ChatGPT Pro to update the circular financing chart from Bloomberg that I include above The output ChatGPT produced is below.

If you have time on your hands, you can try spot the errors of omission and commission, starting with the omission both of yesterday’s deal Xai-Anthropic deal and the Broadcom-OpenAI deal, and also has some very obsolete valuations. Even so, what’s there (mostly true?) is still pretty wild.

Subscribe now

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from Marcus on AI