On-Policy Distillation Meets Off-Policy GRPO: Training Compact Instruction-Following Rerankers
Mirrored from arXiv — Machine Learning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Machine Learning
Title:On-Policy Distillation Meets Off-Policy GRPO: Training Compact Instruction-Following Rerankers
Abstract:Compact instruction-following rerankers are attractive for deployment, but conventional distillation pipelines typically train students by offline imitation of teacher outputs on a fixed set of examples, constraining supervision to the teacher's observed ranking space. We revisit reranker distillation through the lens of reinforcement learning.
We propose a two-stage framework combining off-policy teacher optimization with on-policy student distillation. In Stage 1, a 4B teacher reranker is strengthened with off-policy GRPO using LLM-judge feedback on 88K instruction-following examples. In Stage 2, a compact 1B student samples rankings from its own policy and receives soft teacher-derived rewards on those rankings, coupling student exploration with knowledge transfer.
Our strongest gains appear under distribution shift. On MAIR-11, the original 11-subset, 869-query evaluation, the proposed student reaches 0.7670 nDCG@6, outperforming offline listwise KD by +4.6 points. Controlled comparisons against offline pairwise RankNet KD and on-policy GKD show that neither changing the offline distillation objective nor moving teacher-distribution matching on-policy reproduces the performance of reward-based on-policy distillation over student-sampled rankings. The advantage persists on MAIR-Full: across all 126 tasks and 9,356 queries, the proposed method obtains the highest task-macro point estimates among the evaluated distillation variants, reaching 0.6808 nDCG@6 and 0.7865 MRR@6. It also exceeds two released 7B RL-trained rerankers on the comparable MAIR-11 evaluation, while the same Stage 2 training procedure consistently improves three architecturally distinct alternative student backbones.
On the 9,861-query validation benchmark, the resulting 1B reranker achieves 0.7624 nDCG@6 while providing a favorable quality-efficiency tradeoff relative to larger alternatives.
| Comments: | EMNLP 2026 Findings |
| Subjects: | Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2609.01947 [cs.LG] |
| (or arXiv:2609.01947v1 [cs.LG] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.01947
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
|
Submission history
From: Vignesh Prabhakar [view email][v1] Tue, 1 Sep 2026 23:36:19 UTC (3,614 KB)
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
More from arXiv — Machine Learning
-
Sparse Priors for Efficient Distribution Learning
Sep 21
-
Elastic Threshold Attention: Learned Contextual Sparsity for Long-Context Decoding
Sep 21
-
Bio-MF: Low-Latency and High-Fidelity EEG-to-fNIRS Cross-Modal Generation for Hybrid Motor-Imagery Brain--Computer Interfaces
Sep 21
-
Continuous Delayed-Memory Stochastic Gradient Descent and Continuous-Time Reinforcement Learning from History of Astrophysical Time Series Studies
Sep 21
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.